Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fedekunze/1543 consistent unit tests #1580

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 16, 2018
Merged

Conversation

fedekunze
Copy link
Contributor

@fedekunze fedekunze commented Nov 15, 2018

Closes #1543 and #1377

Description:

❤️ Thank you!


  • Added entries in CHANGELOG.md with issue # and GitHub username
  • Reviewed Files changed in the github PR explorer

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1580 into develop will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #1580      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    96.61%   96.7%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          100      98       -2     
  Lines         1950    1945       -5     
  Branches        95      95              
==========================================
- Hits          1884    1881       -3     
+ Misses          56      54       -2     
  Partials        10      10
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rc/renderer/components/governance/PageProposal.vue 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...rc/renderer/components/staking/DelegationModal.vue 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
.../renderer/components/staking/UndelegationModal.vue 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

@fedekunze fedekunze changed the title WIP: fedekunze/1543 consistent unit tests fedekunze/1543 consistent unit tests Nov 15, 2018
@fedekunze fedekunze merged commit 682acba into develop Nov 16, 2018
@fedekunze fedekunze deleted the fedekunze/1543-unit-tests branch November 16, 2018 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consistent way of writing unit tests
2 participants