Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.2] Fixed return type of wishlist's getImageData in DocBlock #15718

Conversation

rogyar
Copy link
Contributor

@rogyar rogyar commented Jun 3, 2018

Description

\Magento\Wishlist\CustomerData\Wishlist::getImageData() method returns an array but in DocBlock the \Magento\Catalog\Block\Product\Image is highligted as the return type. The fix corrects the return type in method's DockBlock.

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

N/A

Manual testing scenarios

N/A

Original PR

#15717

@magento-cicd2
Copy link
Contributor

magento-cicd2 commented Jun 3, 2018

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Partner: Atwix Pull Request is created by partner Atwix partners-contribution Pull Request is created by Magento Partner Component: Wishlist labels Jun 3, 2018
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added this to the Release: 2.2.6 milestone Jun 4, 2018
magento-team pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2018
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team merged commit e76a3a1 into magento:2.2-develop Jun 4, 2018
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rogyar. Thank you for your contribution.
Changes from your Pull Request will be available with the upcoming 2.2.6 release.

Please, consider to port this solution to 2.3 release line.
You may use Porting tool to port commits automatically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Wishlist Partner: Atwix Pull Request is created by partner Atwix partners-contribution Pull Request is created by Magento Partner Progress: accept Release Line: 2.2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants