Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed commented out line for ignoring coding standards #6913

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2017
Merged

Removed commented out line for ignoring coding standards #6913

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2017

Conversation

dverkade
Copy link
Member

@dverkade dverkade commented Oct 6, 2016

Removed commented out line for ignoring coding standards, this line should not be in the code and is removed for cleaner more readable code.

Removed commented out line for ignoring coding standards, this line should not be in the code and is removed for cleaner more readable code.
@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

There is more than one occurrence of such annotation in source code currently.

At some point a huge mistake was made and instead of automatic fix of PSR-2 violations all problematic files were just excluded from coding style check. To fix this @codingStandardsIgnoreFile annotation usage must be prohibited and all existing violations corrected. Until then coding style violations elimination here and there seems to be a Sisyphean task to me.

You can see that after you restored coding style check, static test started to fail: https://travis-ci.org/magento/magento2/jobs/165630323 This error is easy to fix but not automatically.

Changed line length so that the @ignoreCodingStandard which was removed will not throw an exception anymore.
@vrann
Copy link
Contributor

vrann commented Mar 21, 2017

@dverkade Appreciate your participation in the Magento community!

@dverkade dverkade deleted the patch-13 branch June 22, 2018 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants