[WEB-2001] feat: Fix local cache issues v2 #5712
Conversation
- Add IS null where condition in query utils
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files in the codebase. Key modifications include the addition of a new index field, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
SatishGandham
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
web/core/local-db/utils/indexes.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-71: Consider addressing TODOs and improving error handlingWhile reviewing the entire file, I noticed a few areas for potential improvement:
- There's a commented out line for the "priority" index. Consider either removing this comment or implementing the index if it's needed.
- There's a TODO for "Estimate Points". It might be worth addressing this in a future update.
- The error handling in the
createIndexesfunction could be more robust. Currently, it only logs the error message.Consider updating the error handling in the
createIndexesfunction:try { await Promise.all(promises); } catch (e) { - console.log((e as Error).message); + console.error("Error creating indexes:", (e as Error).message); + // Consider adding more specific error handling or rethrowing the error if needed }Also, consider addressing the TODO and the commented out "priority" index in future updates to improve the completeness of the indexing strategy.
web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts (2)
19-25: Approved: Improved async handling and data mergingThe changes to the
updatePersistentLayerfunction are well-implemented:
- The use of an async forEach loop allows for proper handling of asynchronous operations within the loop.
- Retrieving
dbIssuefrom persistence before merging ensures that the latest data from the persistent layer is considered.- Using the spread operator for merging is a clean and efficient way to combine the objects.
These improvements align well with the PR objectives of fixing local cache issues.
Consider using
Promise.allfor potential performance improvement:await Promise.all(issueIds.map(async (issueId) => { // ... rest of the function body }));This change would allow for parallel processing of all issues, potentially speeding up the operation for multiple issues.
No existing tests found for
updatePersistentLayerIt appears that there are no test files related to the
updatePersistentLayerfunction. To ensure comprehensive coverage and prevent potential regressions, please consider adding unit and integration tests for this function.
- Files referencing
updatePersistentLayer:
web/core/store/issue/helpers/base-issues.store.tsweb/core/store/issue/issue.store.tsweb/core/store/issue/issue-details/sub_issues.store.tsweb/local-db/utils/utils.ts🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
16-56: Summary: Improved local cache handlingThe changes to the
updatePersistentLayerfunction effectively address the PR objectives:
- The issue description is now properly stored in the local cache.
- The function now handles asynchronous operations more efficiently.
- The merging of data ensures that the most up-to-date information is stored.
These improvements will enhance the reliability and performance of the local caching mechanism.
To ensure the changes are fully effective and don't introduce any regressions:
- Please update any existing unit tests for this function to cover the new async behavior and the addition of 'description_html'.
- Consider adding integration tests that verify the correct storage and retrieval of issue data, including the description.
Run the following script to check for existing tests that may need updating:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test files related to updatePersistentLayer rg --type typescript -g '*test*' -g '*spec*' 'updatePersistentLayer'Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test files related to updatePersistentLayer using the correct type rg --type ts -g '*test*' -g '*spec*' 'updatePersistentLayer'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find test files related to updatePersistentLayer using fd and rg fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx -g '*test*' -g '*spec*' | xargs rg 'updatePersistentLayer'Length of output: 1097
web/core/local-db/utils/load-workspace.ts (3)
Line range hint
44-58: Consider adding error handling to data loading functionsThe data loading functions (e.g.,
loadLabels,loadModules, etc.) currently don't have explicit error handling. Consider wrapping the main logic of these functions in try-catch blocks to handle potential errors gracefully. This will prevent silent failures and improve the robustness of the application.Example implementation:
export const loadLabels = async (workspaceSlug: string, batchSize = 500) => { try { const issueLabelService = new IssueLabelService(); const objects = await issueLabelService.getWorkspaceIssueLabels(workspaceSlug); // ... rest of the function } catch (error) { console.error("Error loading labels:", error); // Consider adding more sophisticated error handling or reporting } };Apply similar error handling to all data loading functions.
Also applies to: 62-76, 80-94, 98-112, 116-134, 138-152
Line range hint
44-58: Refactor batch insertion logic to reduce code duplicationThe batch insertion logic is repeated across multiple functions (
loadLabels,loadModules, etc.). Consider abstracting this common pattern into a reusable function to improve code maintainability and reduce duplication.Example implementation:
const batchInsert = async ( objects: any[], table: string, schema: Schema, batchSize: number ) => { for (let i = 0; i < objects.length; i += batchSize) { const batch = objects.slice(i, i + batchSize); persistence.db.exec("BEGIN TRANSACTION;"); batch.forEach((item: any) => { stageInserts(table, schema, item); }); await persistence.db.exec("COMMIT;"); } }; export const loadLabels = async (workspaceSlug: string, batchSize = 500) => { const issueLabelService = new IssueLabelService(); const objects = await issueLabelService.getWorkspaceIssueLabels(workspaceSlug); await batchInsert(objects, "labels", labelSchema, batchSize); }; // Apply similar refactoring to other loading functionsThis refactoring will make the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
Also applies to: 62-76, 80-94, 98-112, 116-134, 138-152
Line range hint
116-134: OptimizeloadEstimatePointsfunction for performanceThe
loadEstimatePointsfunction currently fetches all estimates and then processes them to extract points. This approach might be inefficient, especially if there are many estimates or if the points data is large.Consider optimizing this function by:
- Fetching only the necessary data (points) from the API if possible.
- If the API doesn't support fetching only points, process the estimates in batches instead of loading all of them into memory at once.
Example optimization:
export const loadEstimatePoints = async (workspaceSlug: string, batchSize = 500) => { const estimateService = new EstimateService(); const estimates = await estimateService.fetchWorkspaceEstimates(workspaceSlug); for (const estimate of estimates) { if (estimate?.points) { await batchInsert(estimate.points, "estimate_points", estimatePointSchema, batchSize); } } };This approach processes estimates one at a time, reducing memory usage and potentially improving performance for large datasets.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- web/core/local-db/utils/indexes.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/load-workspace.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/query.utils.ts (4 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
web/core/local-db/utils/indexes.ts (1)
13-13: LGTM! Addition of "sequence_id" index improves query performance.The addition of "sequence_id" to the indexed columns aligns with the PR objective of changing the secondary order. This will likely enhance query performance for operations involving this field.
To ensure consistency, let's verify if there are any related changes in query patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful!
All query patterns involving "sequence_id" have been appropriately updated, consistent with the new index. No issues found.
web/core/local-db/utils/query.utils.tsweb/core/store/inbox/project-inbox.store.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for changes in query patterns related to sequence_id # Search for SQL queries using sequence_id rg --type typescript 'SELECT.*sequence_id|ORDER BY.*sequence_id' --glob '!**/indexes.ts' # Search for TypeScript code referencing sequence_id in queries or sorting rg --type typescript 'sequence_id.*sort|sort.*sequence_id' --glob '!**/indexes.ts'Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for changes in query patterns related to sequence_id # Search for SQL queries using sequence_id in TypeScript files rg 'SELECT.*sequence_id|ORDER BY.*sequence_id' --glob '!**/indexes.ts' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' # Search for TypeScript code referencing sequence_id in queries or sorting rg 'sequence_id.*sort|sort.*sequence_id' --glob '!**/indexes.ts' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 951
web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import of persistence objectThe addition of the
persistenceimport from "../storage.sqlite" is appropriate for the changes made in this file, particularly for theupdatePersistentLayerfunction. This aligns with the PR objectives of addressing local cache issues.
53-53: LGTM: Addition of 'description_html' to picked propertiesThe inclusion of 'description_html' in the list of picked properties is a positive change. This ensures that the HTML description of the issue is included when updating the persistent layer, directly addressing the PR objective of fixing the issue where the issue description was removed from the local store.
web/core/local-db/utils/load-workspace.ts (2)
30-33: Excellent security improvement for SQL query construction!These changes effectively address the issue of handling single quotes in both object and string values, which was mentioned in the PR objectives. By escaping single quotes, you've significantly reduced the risk of SQL injection vulnerabilities. This is a crucial security improvement that aligns well with best practices for constructing SQL queries.
Some key points:
- For objects (line 30), single quotes are now properly escaped in the JSON stringified representation.
- For strings (line 33), single quotes are directly escaped.
These modifications ensure that data containing single quotes is correctly inserted into the database without breaking the SQL syntax or introducing security vulnerabilities.
Line range hint
1-158: Summary of review findingsThe changes made in this PR successfully address the issue of handling single quotes in SQL queries, which was one of the main objectives. These modifications significantly improve the security of the application by preventing SQL injection vulnerabilities.
While the immediate changes are beneficial, I've identified several areas for potential improvement:
- Error handling: Adding try-catch blocks to the data loading functions would improve robustness.
- Code duplication: Abstracting the batch insertion logic into a reusable function would enhance maintainability.
- Performance optimization: Refactoring the
loadEstimatePointsfunction could improve efficiency, especially for large datasets.These suggestions, if implemented, would further enhance the overall quality, maintainability, and performance of the code. Consider addressing these in future iterations or as part of ongoing refactoring efforts.
web/core/local-db/utils/query.utils.ts (3)
50-52: LGTM: Improved result ordering with sequence_idThe addition of
${table}sequence_id DESCas a secondary sorting criterion is a good improvement. This change ensures a consistent and deterministic ordering of results, even when there are ties in the primary sorting field. By using DESC order forsequence_id, newer items will appear first within each group of the primary sort, which is usually the desired behavior.
133-133: LGTM: Including sequence_id in the result setThe addition of
i.sequence_idto the SELECT statement is necessary to support the new ordering logic implemented in thegetOrderByFragmentfunction. This change ensures that thesequence_idis available for sorting in the final result set, maintaining consistency with the updated ordering mechanism.
156-156: LGTM: Consistent inclusion of sequence_idThe addition of
i.sequence_idto the SELECT statement in this part of the function maintains consistency with the previous change. This ensures that thesequence_idis included in the result set regardless of whether joins are required or not, providing a uniform data structure for further processing and sorting.
| if (!value) { | ||
| sql += ` AND ${key} IS NULL`; | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential issue with null value handling
The addition of null value handling is a good improvement. However, the current implementation might lead to incorrect SQL generation for array fields. The condition if (!value) will be true for both empty strings and empty arrays, which could cause issues for array fields checked later in the function.
Consider refining the condition to specifically check for empty strings:
- if (!value) {
+ if (value === '') {
sql += ` AND ${key} IS NULL`;
return;
}This change ensures that only empty string values are treated as NULL in the SQL query, while empty arrays are handled correctly by the existing logic for array fields.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!value) { | |
| sql += ` AND ${key} IS NULL`; | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (value === '') { | |
| sql += ` AND ${key} IS NULL`; | |
| return; | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
"sequence_id"field for improved query efficiency.Bug Fixes
Refactor
updatePersistentLayerfunction to handle issue IDs asynchronously, improving data processing efficiency.