[WEB-2707] fix: draft issue module update and code refactor #5889
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new state variable Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx (2)
55-58: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The addition of the
updateModulesToIssuemethod simplifies the process of updating modules for an issue, which is a good improvement. This change aligns well with the simplification mentioned in the AI summary.Consider adding basic error handling to improve robustness:
updateModulesToIssue: async (moduleIds: string[]) => { if (!workspaceSlug || !issue.id) return; - await addModulesToIssue(workspaceSlug.toString(), issue.id, moduleIds); + try { + await addModulesToIssue(workspaceSlug.toString(), issue.id, moduleIds); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to update modules:", error); + // Consider adding user feedback here + } },
87-89: LGTM! Consider improving type safety.The simplification of the
handleModulefunction and the update to its dependency array are good improvements. These changes align well with the modifications made to theissueOperationsobject.To improve type safety, consider using a non-null assertion or a type guard:
const handleModule = useCallback( (moduleIds: string[] | null) => { - if (!issue || !issue.module_ids || !moduleIds) return; + if (!issue?.module_ids || !moduleIds) return; issueOperations.updateModulesToIssue(moduleIds); }, [issueOperations, issue] );This change ensures that
issueis defined whenupdateModulesToIssueis called.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-block.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx (6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-block.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx (4)
98-98: LGTM! Dependency array update is consistent.The update to the dependency array of the
handleCyclefunction, removingcurrentLayoutandpathname, is consistent with the overall changes in the component. This aligns well with the removal of theactiveLayoutprop and related logic.
Line range hint
1-269: Overall changes improve component simplicity and maintainability.The modifications to this component, including the removal of layout-related props and logic, the simplification of module and cycle handling, and the updates to import statements, collectively contribute to a more streamlined and maintainable codebase. These changes align well with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.
Key improvements:
- Simplified module and cycle handling logic
- Removal of unused layout-related code
- Updated import statements for better type safety
The changes suggest a shift in how layout is managed, possibly at a higher level in the component tree. This refactoring appears to be part of a larger effort to improve the draft issue module's architecture.
To ensure these changes haven't introduced any regressions, please verify:
- The functionality of module and cycle management in the draft issue interface
- The correct rendering of the component without the previously used
activeLayoutpropConsider running relevant unit and integration tests, and perform manual testing of the draft issue interface to confirm all functionalities are working as expected.
38-38: LGTM! Verify impact on component functionality.The removal of the
activeLayoutprop from the destructuring is consistent with the changes mentioned in the AI summary. This suggests a shift in how layout management is handled in the component.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the component's functionality, please verify:
- That
activeLayoutis not used elsewhere in the component.- That any parent components passing
activeLayouthave been updated.Run the following command to check for any remaining references to
activeLayoutin this file:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to activeLayout in the file rg 'activeLayout' web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx
5-5: LGTM! Consider verifying unused imports.The changes to the import statements look good. The addition of
useParamsand specific types from '@plane/types' suggests improved type safety and routing functionality. The removal ofuseEventTrackerfrom the hooks import indicates a potential shift in how events are tracked or that this functionality is no longer needed in this component.To ensure code cleanliness, please run the following command to check for any unused imports:
Also applies to: 9-9, 24-24
✅ Verification successful
No unused imports found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unused imports in the file rg --no-filename --no-line-number --only-matching '^import .* from .*' web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx | while read -r import; do if ! rg -q "${import#import * from }" web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx; then echo "Potentially unused import: $import" fi doneLength of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unused imports in the file rg --no-filename --no-line-number --only-matching '^import .* from .*' web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx | while read -r import; do if ! rg -q "${import#import * from }" web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx; then echo "Potentially unused import: $import" fi doneLength of output: 1323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unused imports in the file rg --no-filename --no-line-number --only-matching '^import .* from .*' web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx | while read -r import; do module=$(echo "$import" | sed -E 's/import .* from "(.*)";/\1/') if ! rg -q "$module" web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/draft-issue-properties.tsx; then echo "Potentially unused import: $import" fi doneLength of output: 2682
Changes:
This PR fixes a bug where the module multi-select functionality was not working correctly for draft issues.
Reference:
[WEB-2707]
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CreateUpdateIssueModalto handle moving issues based on user input.Bug Fixes
DraftIssueBlockcomponent to sidebar state changes.Refactor
DraftIssuePropertiescomponent by removing unnecessary imports and simplifying module management logic.activeLayoutproperty from theIIssuePropertiesinterface.