Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Security Vulnerability #894

Closed
TaiPhung217 opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

[BUG] Security Vulnerability #894

TaiPhung217 opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@TaiPhung217
Copy link

Please check the email with the subject line: [Security Vulnerability Report]
@aschonfeld
Copy link
Collaborator

@TaiPhung217 finally got the email from my superiors and will have a hotfix soon. Will keep you posted...

aschonfeld added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@aschonfeld
#894: updates to 'update-settings' endpoint
898632a
aschonfeld added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@aschonfeld
#894: updates to 'update-settings' endpoint
1e26ed3
@aschonfeld
Copy link
Collaborator

@TaiPhung217 v3.16.1 has been released to pypi addressing this issue. Please let me know if you find anything else.

Also, whenever you get a sec do you mind tossing your ⭐ on the repo? Thanks 🙏

@TaiPhung217
Copy link
Author

TaiPhung217 commented Dec 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Ok Thank you for reviewing the report. dropped a star ⭐

@TaiPhung217
Copy link
Author

Could you help me adjust the status of the report on huntr.com? Thanks 🙏

@aschonfeld
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't really know much about the huntr website, but I logged in and all I can do is submit comments. I've submitted a comment that will hopefully give you credit for finding this bug.

@TaiPhung217
Copy link
Author

Yea, thank you so, so much! 💖💖💖

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@aschonfeld @TaiPhung217