Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build on windows against stock node v4 and v6 #758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2017
Merged

Conversation

springmeyer
Copy link
Member

@springmeyer springmeyer commented Apr 19, 2017

Moves build on appveyor to use the normal (aka stock) node.exe from nodejs.org (installed using appveyor shortcuts).

TODO:

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 19, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #758 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #758   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.23%   96.23%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        8810     8810           
=======================================
  Hits         8478     8478           
  Misses        332      332

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c335992...0210030. Read the comment docs.

@springmeyer springmeyer added this to the v3.6.1 milestone May 25, 2017
@springmeyer
Copy link
Member Author

This is working now: we are building cleanly against the stock node v0.10, 4, 6, and 8 on windows. Going to merge this into master.

@springmeyer springmeyer merged commit 6c46d4c into master May 31, 2017
@springmeyer springmeyer changed the title [WIP] Attempt to build on windows against stock node v4 and v6 Build on windows against stock node v4 and v6 May 31, 2017
@springmeyer springmeyer deleted the win-test-dane branch September 10, 2017 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants