feat: Rethink parsing

[Aiving]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.75418% with 134 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.82%. Comparing base (3078a28) to head (9836be6).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/state/src/values/font.rs	34.84%	43 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/lexing.rs	83.91%	23 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/parsing.rs	85.38%	19 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/font_style.rs	30.43%	16 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/layout.rs	83.87%	5 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/values/size.rs	88.09%	5 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/style.rs	42.85%	4 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/values/overflow.rs	55.55%	4 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/transform.rs	57.14%	3 Missing ⚠️
crates/state/src/values/color.rs	96.51%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 6 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #785      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.99%   75.82%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         207      208       +1     
  Lines       23775    23793      +18     
==========================================
- Hits        18067    18040      -27     
- Misses       5708     5753      +45     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[marc2332]

Having to write

let mut parser = Parser::new(Lexer::parse(value));

every time in the node states is a step back, why aren't those using parse_value?

[Aiving]

Having to write

let mut parser = Parser::new(Lexer::parse(value));

every time in the node states is a step back, why aren't those using parse_value?

I forgot to change the node states code when I added the parse_value, will make fix commit soon

[Aiving]

@marc2332 done

[marc2332]

Can you make sure that all the examples run just fine @Aiving ?

[marc2332]

Can you make sure that all the examples run just fine @Aiving ?

You may do this by running the examples.sh script

[Aiving]

Can you make sure that all the examples run just fine @Aiving ?

You may do this by running the examples.sh script

oki, i'll try

[marc2332]

Conflicts @Aiving

[Aiving]

Conflicts @Aiving

resolved!

[marc2332]

We need to make sure no example broke