-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Join adjacent inlineText tokens #1926
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
65b7a35
Join adjacent innerText tokens
calculuschild 0ade5ac
Update marked.esm.js
calculuschild 72e7cc8
fix lexer unit tests
UziTech 87f4704
Merge pull request #2 from UziTech/pr/1926
calculuschild d7bb213
Move merge logic for block code to Lexer
calculuschild 1c5cf59
Update lib/marked.esm.js
calculuschild ead6e66
Update lib/marked.esm.js
calculuschild 3b1130e
Update code & text signatures in Docs
calculuschild 296e327
Merge branch 'joinInnerTextTokens' of https://github.com/calculuschil…
calculuschild File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should check for a paragraph before we call the
code
tokenizer? That might save some work that doesn't need to be done.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably worth trying. It's a tradeoff of always checking
LastToken
and sometimes callingcodeTokenizer
vs always callingcodeTokenizer
and sometimes checkingLastToken
. I'm not sure how often this situation comes up that one would be better than the other.Edit: If
LastToken
is a paragraph though what do we do? Just continue? or call the "text" tokenizer out of sequence?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I suppose we would still need to call code tokenizer to see if we should skip the other tokens. Maybe it is still better to check code tokenizer first.