Skip to content

Conversation

@pengzhouml
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@vitalykorolev
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like this PR contains a lot more than the title states. Please add some comments about what's actually in this PR.

@pengzhouml pengzhouml changed the base branch from main to develop February 5, 2025 07:07
@rwinieski rwinieski self-requested a review February 5, 2025 08:14
Copy link
Collaborator

@rwinieski rwinieski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pengzhouml you take the chance the change the data volume name which is good.

Could you add a relevant commit message?

@pengzhouml
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pengzhouml you take the chance the change the data volume name which is good.

Could you add a relevant commit message?

Sure. Will do that

@pengzhouml pengzhouml force-pushed the bugfix/MLE-19691-storageClass branch from a81f9d1 to cd9f9f9 Compare February 6, 2025 00:20
@pengzhouml pengzhouml requested a review from rwinieski February 6, 2025 00:25
@pengzhouml pengzhouml changed the title Bugfix MLE-19691 StorageClass when leave empty not pointing to default Bugfix MLE-19691 StorageClass when leave empty not pointing to default and change the name of data director to datadir Feb 6, 2025
@pengzhouml pengzhouml merged commit d295d84 into develop Feb 6, 2025
2 checks passed
@pengzhouml pengzhouml deleted the bugfix/MLE-19691-storageClass branch February 11, 2025 20:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants