Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cooperation: Offline QR Code Generator Firefox add-on #32

Open
rugk opened this issue May 21, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Cooperation: Offline QR Code Generator Firefox add-on #32

rugk opened this issue May 21, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented May 21, 2019

I am the dev of a Firefox add-on for generating QR codes and I really like your QR code scanner/generator, because:

  1. It is, as my add-on, offline. (Okay, maybe that's still quite common in Android apps. I can assure you, in add-ons/websites, it is not.)
  2. (As part of 1.) it does not send tracking data and is FLOSS.
  3. It has a really nice icon UI and icon, in contrast to these other barcode generator apps.
  4. It works with inverted QR codes and can do useful things with the things it has scanned.

Now what?

So, however, when generating and scanning a QR code, you always need two parts: the reader and scanner. On two devices.

I mostly consider this use case: transmit some (potentially private) data from your desktop to your phone.

That's why I'd want to ask, whether we could maybe some kind of "cooperation" to suggest that we can link to each other's app/recommend it, as both things have quite common goals, IMHO. (more on that below)

What to do?

The exact details can be discussed, but I have a system to show a "random tip" to the add-on user in rare circumstances (non-annoying!). There I already have other tips included, but may also add a recommendation for your app.

Why?

Because, IMHO, the users of our software(s) will only benefit.

  • It helps no one, if you have a private QR code generator, but the QR code scanner sends the data everywhere. (and vice versa)
    So recommending a good app/add-on for the "other" part to the user, helps to increase the overall ("end-to-end") security.
  • IMHO, we both put effort into making the UI as simple as possible.
  • From my perspective: This app solves many problems (inverted QR codes) that OfflineQr users may get in trouble with. (Warning for inverted QR codes (when background color is dark and foreground light) rugk/offline-qr-code#20)
  • My add-on can also be used on Android, but I think the performance and quality of a native app cannot be matched.
  • Personally, I see your QR code generator app as the best FLOSS app, I've used. (see list at the top of this issue)

That said (potential problems):

  • Obviously, the use cases overlap, so we are "competitors", because a) my add-on works on Android and b) your app can be used to generate QR codes, too. However, as you see above, I'd still use (and I personally do use) your app on Android. Also, we're FLOSS, so it's not that we would gain anything, if people did not use the app or the add-on.
  • Problem: The platforms of our pieces of software really do not match. Obviously, this is problematic, because we cannot know whether our users use Android or Firefox.
    IMHO, this is, however, a trade-off we can accept, because it's the nature of QR codes that you want to transmit data between different platforms, devices, browsers etc.

Also, I am indeed calling for an unobtrusive way and not for big banners or so.


I am deliberately requesting this in an issue tracker publicly here, to discuss this transparently, because this is as FLOSS projects should do it. That's my opinion, at least. 😃


Let me know what you think. 😃

@klawdhfzasjhaa
Copy link

+1
I use those two apps to transfer data between devices. :)

@rugk
Copy link
Author

rugk commented Jan 14, 2021

Yeah, however, due to lack of response, I do not think this will happen. I've found another very good barcode scanner for Android (on F-Droid and other stores), however: wewewe718/QrAndBarcodeScanner#60

@markusfisch
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the lack of response - I was quite a bit overwhelmed by your request to be honest 😬 Which is my fault, of course. I just didn't know what to make of it.

But it's good to see you found an alternative 👍 The app looks very good and it may even be a better fit because its UI is way more intuitive than mine is.

@rugk
Copy link
Author

rugk commented Jan 14, 2021

Well, no problem. It would just have been a small integration, nothing more. 😊
Anyway, your app has server me well for many years! And I still have it installed, because I cannot decide sometimes…

But yeah, the other app is very good as well… 🤷

The app looks very good and it may even be a better fit because its UI is way more intuitive than mine is.

Yours is also very intuitive or at least easy and minimalistic, but yeah the other one is also very good UI-wise. 😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants