slow in my environment

[TinoPlayStuff]

hi,

I tried this api, its very convenient but relatively slow.
So I modify it to use "session":

1. add one line under import requests as

   import requests
   re_session = requests.Session()
   

2. modify another line

   response: requests.models.Response = getattr(requests, method)( 
   => response: requests.models.Response = getattr(re_session, method)(
   

It's much faster now, but still slower than using subprocess.Popen to call curl for the same thing.

Is this the limitation of the python requests module or maybe I did something wrong?

[marph91]

Hi @TinoPlayStuff,

thanks for the feedback. I didn't think about the speed for now. In general I would expect requests to be almost as fast as curl. It seems to be an issue/limitation of joppy.

Could you add a reproducer for your issue? I. e. some sample requests and how fast they are on your machine with curl and joppy? I couldn't observe a big difference when using sessions in the testsuite, but this could be due to the testsuite structure.

[TinoPlayStuff]

in run_py.zip, there are two python scripts, run.py and run_request.py.
They do basically the same thing. The main difference between them is that the "run.py" is totally based on curl, while in run_requests.py, many of the http stuff have been replaced with joppy api.

To run them, you have to put your joplin token in run.py.tok
and edit settings in run.py or run_requests.py as:

# <- setting
TOK_FILE = "run.py.tok"  # file contains joplin token
PUBTAG = "published"  # note with this tag will be extracted
TAGHIDE = {"published", "publishedx"} # test tag
N_FDR = "./_posts"  # where to put the exported posts
R_FDR = "./_resources"  # where to put resource files (.jpg, .png, ...)
URL = "http://localhost:41184/"
# -> setting

with such setting, all notes with tag "published" (defined as PUBTAG) and related resource files will be put into ./_posts and ./_resources (defined as N_FDR and R_FDR respectively)
The scripts will report start time and end time.

the joppy in this zip is modified to use requests.session
In my environment with a forty notes test, the curl version is 20% faster.
If use original joppy, it's too long and I didn't wait it finish

run_py.zip

[marph91]

Unfortunately I couldn't run your script out of the box. It's recommended to pass the Popen as sequence instead of a string (https://docs.python.org/3/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen) to avoid OS dependent problems.

However, I did a "dry" look at the script. Notes:

• At first I thought it's about the pagination. But you resolved the pagination manually most of the time. Since your test data is only 40 notes, it shouldn't make a difference anyway. Are these plain notes or do they have tags and resources attached?
• It seems like a 20 % speed difference between curl and requests is in the expected range: https://stackoverflow.com/a/32899936/7410886
• It seems reasonable that using a session is faster. However, I can't see a significant speedup at my local tests. Will try further.

[TinoPlayStuff]

Thanks for your explanation. Today I made some modifications and ... ...
now run_requests.py (with joppy using a session) is a little faster than run.py.

The main modification is that I now use shutil.copy2() to directly copy resource files from joplinprofile folder. Thus the original insufficient performance may be from that I used your get_resource_file function is an improper way.

FYI, I ran these scripts on a windows 11 machine with python 3.7. Without session, it takes more than one second to deal with one note and related resource files.

Thanks again for your convenient api