Support S3 custom model without explicit credentials #948
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
farshidz
temporarily deployed
to
marqo-test-suite
GitHub Actions
Inactive
wanliAlex
previously approved these changes
Aug 27, 2024
farshidz
temporarily deployed
to
marqo-test-suite
GitHub Actions
Inactive
wanliAlex
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Bug fix
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
Custom model download from S3 is only possible if credentials are provided to Marqo.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Custom models can be downloaded from S3 using machine credentials e.g., using role-based auth through role attached to the machine running Marqo.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
No
Have unit tests been run against this PR? (Has there also been any additional testing?)
Not covered. Tested manually
Related Python client changes (link commit/PR here)
Related documentation changes (link commit/PR here)
Other information:
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements