About 'MinimalAPIs'. The 'var app = builder.AddServices();' method name not very semanty.Bacause it doesn't look like building a 'WebApplication' object.It like add a service.

[MapleWithoutWords]

The 'var app = builder.AddServices();' method does three thing inside. As follow:
1: Add 'MinimalAPIs' service
2: Building 'WebApplication' object and add to contianer collection
3: Initing 'MasaApp' class.

It deserves have a better name.

[doddgu]

@zhenlei520 what do you think?

[MapleWithoutWords]

My English not is very good,very chinese english.hope you can look understandand.
and about 'MasaApp' class this design.
I think and 'Abp vNext' IAbpApplication class design compare, 'AbpvNext' design is better. though it and 'Abp vNext' IAbpApplication class design similar, but 'Abp vNext' can have more extension space

[MapleWithoutWords]

I will 'MasaApp' class can support extensions. just like 'AbpVNext' same .

[zhenlei520]

MasaApp is only used to store global configurations. Normally, developers don't need to use it. Although it seems that it is not as elegant as IAbpApplication, because of this, it becomes easier to master it.

[zhenlei520]

The 'var app = builder.AddServices();' method does three thing inside. As follow: 1: Add 'MinimalAPIs' service 2: Building 'WebApplication' object and add to contianer collection 3: Initing 'MasaApp' class.

It deserves have a better name.

AddServices is indeed easy to bring ambiguity, we will try to optimize it later

[doddgu]

I don't think we can work around the minimalapi map limitation right now.
If we just split the AddServices, it's meaningless.

[zhenlei520]

I don't think we can work around the minimalapi map limitation right now. If we just split the AddServices, it's meaningless.

can try to register to the App through other methods, like AddControllers, but the premise is that it is not fixed in WebApplicationBuilder. This needs to be confirmed after checking the source code of AspNetCore. At present, there is no guarantee that it can be done.

[doddgu]

So, what's next?

[MapleWithoutWords]

MasaApp is only used to store global configurations. Normally, developers don't need to use it. Although it seems that it is not as elegant as IAbpApplication, because of this, it becomes easier to master it.

I'm understand. Thanks!

[zhenlei520]

So, what's next?

I will first determine whether the next plan is feasible and wait for the follow-up results

[doddgu]

I think just keep the design now. Until minimal api map remove limits.

[MapleWithoutWords]

I have a suggestion. can refer to my 'NET.AutoApi' this package's design. it can dynamic will service method map to route.but this not is microsoft minialapi's design. this is blog address: https://www.cnblogs.com/norain/p/17049662.html @zhenlei520

[MapleWithoutWords]

I have a suggestion. can refer to my 'NET.AutoApi' this package's design. it can dynamic will service method map to route.but this not is microsoft minialapi's design. this is blog address: https://www.cnblogs.com/norain/p/17049662.html @zhenlei520

the package need Add Mvc depend，it already not is minialapi. for reference only.

[doddgu]

ServiceBase is not the final form. 2.0 will be the final part of the design.

[zhenlei520]

@doddgu

The previous consideration was complicated. We can get WebApplication in a simpler way, which only changes the registration method, but does not need to modify the use of ServiceBase, like

It doesn't require much code modification, unfortunately app.MapMinimalAPIs() is a must

[doddgu]

It's ok, just another way to use.it.