Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update to JNet 1.5.2 #169

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 14, 2023
Merged

Update to JNet 1.5.2 #169

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 14, 2023

Conversation

masesdevelopers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR:

  • updates to JNet 1.5.2
  • updates performance evaluation with latest evolutions
  • changes some classes to use Iterable from JNet

Related Issue

Fix #92
Fix #121

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers added enhancement New feature or request KNet KNet related issue labels Mar 14, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers self-assigned this Mar 14, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers linked an issue Mar 14, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Add a benchmark to verify performance #53
Open
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers merged commit 3cf3a0e into masesgroup:master Mar 14, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers deleted the 92-knet-shall-be-always-aligned-to-latest-jnet-release-1-5-2 branch March 14, 2023 03:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers

Labels
enhancement New feature or request KNet KNet related issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@masesdevelopers