Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Integration with codecov #7

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2016

Conversation

seanoshea
Copy link
Contributor

See #6 for the rationale behind this PR.

Would need someone under the umbrella of the material-foundation to actually enable integration with codecov. Otherwise the badge on the README will not reflect the latest coverage measure on master.

https://codecov.io/gh/seanoshea/material-text-accessibility-ios/commit/839e6231eb2e2cd32ddfb0e43a062921623ce0e8 shows what the current coverage is for the library which was generated by https://travis-ci.org/seanoshea/material-text-accessibility-ios/builds/148757829.

Building on all branches for this test.

Commenting this out for the time being.

Trying this out.

Altering the project file to generate test coverage files.
@seanoshea seanoshea mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 67.75% (diff: 100%)

No coverage report found for master at d3ec9b4.

Powered by Codecov. Last update d3ec9b4...d28a612

@ajsecord
Copy link
Member

ajsecord commented Aug 1, 2016

Thanks for the pull request! We have to check to see if we can grant codecov the permissions it wants.

@seanoshea
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ajsecord - Sounds good. I'm a big fan of using code coverage. codecov acts as a nice gatekeeper for PRs & has pretty sweet github integrations. I should really try using it for some of my other projects.

@jverkoey
Copy link
Contributor

jverkoey commented Aug 1, 2016

The permissions for codecov are similar to Travis CI (no direct code access needed), so we should be good. I'll look into turning it on for the material-motion repos as well.

@ajsecord
Copy link
Member

ajsecord commented Aug 1, 2016

We just enabled material-foundation for codecov.io.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants