-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Topological structures on numFields #188
Conversation
nop, there should be a structure merge between numDomainType and pointedType |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there should be a "pointedNumDomain" Structure :-/
But it's too heavy with HB...
You mean without? |
yes, without |
483fb14
to
1a8fa85
Compare
So in the end, with @mkerjean suggestion, this will happen... but as part of a bigger commit making all |
Something like that?
|
Hum, no, I meant, with @mkerjean's suggestion, we do not have dedicated structures, but we indeed do what your PR originally did, but on a larger scale (every structure above num field should have coercions and canonicals to pointed, filtered, topological, pseudometric and normed types...) |
I'll be updating this PR today (AoE maybe). |
(to be closed, see #205) |
Subsumed by #205 |
Is this change of canonical structures correct?