Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better inE #202

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2020
Merged

Better inE #202

merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2020

Conversation

CohenCyril
Copy link
Member

By adding in_setE to inE we prioritize this unfolding, which makes x \in A where A is a classical set behave in a more natural way.

@CohenCyril CohenCyril merged commit f8d361a into master May 8, 2020
@CohenCyril CohenCyril deleted the better_inE branch May 8, 2020 17:00
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist mentioned this pull request May 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant