Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

State processor interrupt #819

Merged

Conversation

cffls
Copy link
Contributor

@cffls cffls commented Apr 11, 2023

Description

Allow process in state processor to be interrupted by caller

Changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
  • Hotfix (change that solves an urgent issue, and requires immediate attention)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
  • Changes only for a subset of nodes

Breaking changes

Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it

Nodes audience

In case this PR includes changes that must be applied only to a subset of nodes, please specify how you handled it (e.g. by adding a flag with a default value...)

Checklist

  • I have added at least 2 reviewer or the whole pos-v1 team
  • I have added sufficient documentation in code
  • I will be resolving comments - if any - by pushing each fix in a separate commit and linking the commit hash in the comment reply

Cross repository changes

  • This PR requires changes to heimdall
    • In case link the PR here:
  • This PR requires changes to matic-cli
    • In case link the PR here:

Testing

  • I have added unit tests
  • I have added tests to CI
  • I have tested this code manually on local environment
  • I have tested this code manually on remote devnet using express-cli
  • I have tested this code manually on mumbai
  • I have created new e2e tests into express-cli

Manual tests

Please complete this section with the steps you performed if you ran manual tests for this functionality, otherwise delete it

Additional comments

Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (block-stm@463bea0). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             block-stm     #819   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage             ?   56.87%           
============================================
  Files                ?      617           
  Lines                ?    73306           
  Branches             ?        0           
============================================
  Hits                 ?    41691           
  Misses               ?    28090           
  Partials             ?     3525           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@cffls cffls changed the base branch from block-stm to develop April 12, 2023 00:47
@cffls cffls changed the base branch from develop to block-stm April 12, 2023 00:47
@cffls cffls merged commit d76fc15 into maticnetwork:block-stm Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants