Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update outdated rust issues link for unsoundness bugs #120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/posts/2020-09-20-why-not-rust.dj
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ So, here's my attempt to argue _against_ Rust:
Two such extensions might be fine in isolation, but lead to undefined behavior if used simultaneously:
[Observational equivalence and unsafe code](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2016/10/02/observational-equivalence-and-unsafe-code/).

Finally, there are outright [bugs in the compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22I-unsound+%F0%9F%92%A5%22++).
Finally, there are outright [bugs in the compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AI-unsound+sort%3Aupdated-desc).

---

Expand Down