This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Fix a missing await when in the spaces summary #10208
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b4501c1
Add a simple spaces summary test.
clokep 596bab1
Abstract assertions.
clokep adbb15a
Add a test for visibility.
clokep 51988b7
Add a test for world-readable rooms.
clokep 6a3f220
Remove an unused variable.
clokep 6a5ee44
Newsfragment
clokep 14d9741
Fix typo.
clokep File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix a bug introduced in v1.35.1 where an `allow` key of a `m.room.join_rules` event could be applied for incorrect room versions and configurations. | ||
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this explains it well enough, but not awaiting there it means that you could have a room with
allow
set in the join rules, but a join rule of notrestricted
and those allow rules would still be applied.Realistically I don't think this is user visible unless someone was messing with join rules in a weird way, although it means you could slightly leak data if you did this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this was more user-visible, I'd probably suggest rephrasing "an
allow
key of am.room.join_rules
event could be applied" with something more user-digestible, but as it's not it's likely more useful to be clear about what exactly the missing await affected. In which case, to a developer, this is very clear 🙂