This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Fix reactivated users not being added to the user directory #10782
Merged
DMRobertson
merged 12 commits into
develop
from
dmr/reactivated-users-in-directory-direct-to-develop
Sep 23, 2021
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ad6eab0
Cherry-pick "Fix reactivated users not being added to directory "
cf73b68
Changelog
963891e
Oops, missing import; lint.
c9b1de0
Move the comment down too
43a77af
Elaborate on the comment.
d795fc8
Use password handler rather than direct insertion
fe11ead
Duplicate changelog
8acffee
Merge branch 'develop' into dmr/reactivated-users-in-directory-direct…
e5e1be1
Get handler with getter, not private member
9e75c8f
Reactivate user via admin api, not hacks
1b637d4
Update changelog.d/10782.bugfix
d5c5558
Remove duplicate changelog from old branch
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix a bug where reactivated users would be missing from the user directory. | ||
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix a bug where reactivated users would be missing from the user directory. | ||
DMRobertson marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can probably just remove this one (but also be sure to remove it from the other branch).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I follow you here (given that towncrier coalesces identical fragments). Is there a specific gain by tidying this up, or is it just nicer to have?
(Happy to clean up, but just anxious that it's further git-churn)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't seem useful is all, it would end up pointing people to two identical PRs, which seems confusing.
I don't feel strongly either way, however.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, looking at the review page properly, I see what you mean: this PR adds two changelog files!!! (I thought you were referring to the two different files on two different PRs)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 please remove the duplicate newsfile!