Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enhancement] sql: add client host and proxy host in session status. #15256

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

volgariver6
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

  • API-change
  • BUG
  • Improvement
  • Documentation
  • Feature
  • Test and CI
  • Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue #15203

What this PR does / why we need it:

add client host and proxy host in session status.

@matrix-meow matrix-meow added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes [100,499] lines label Apr 1, 2024
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from sukki37 April 1, 2024 07:23
@matrix-meow
Copy link
Contributor

@volgariver6 Thanks for your contributions!

Here are review comments for file pkg/frontend/mysql_protocol.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title and Body:

The title and body of the pull request clearly state that the purpose of the PR is to enhance the SQL functionality by adding client host and proxy host in session status. The title indicates that it is an improvement type of PR and references the related issue #15203. The body provides a brief explanation of the changes made. However, it would be beneficial to include more detailed information about why adding client host and proxy host in session status is necessary for better context.

Changes in pkg/frontend/mysql_protocol.go:

  1. Variable Naming Issue:

    • The variable i is not descriptive and does not convey its purpose. It is recommended to use a more meaningful name to improve code readability and maintainability.
  2. Unused Code Removal:

    • The code related to proxy.NewVersionedExtraInfo and its methods like GetSalt, GetLabel, GetConnectionID, and GetInternalConn are no longer being used after the changes. It is advisable to remove this unused code to declutter the file and improve code cleanliness.
  3. Error Handling Improvement:

    • The error handling for decoding ExtraInfo could be enhanced by providing more specific error messages or logging to aid in debugging and troubleshooting.
  4. Code Optimization:

    • Instead of accessing ExtraInfo fields individually, consider directly assigning them to the session object to simplify the code and make it more concise.
  5. Security Concern - Lack of Validation:

    • Ensure that the ClientAddr and ProxyAddr values from ExtraInfo are properly validated to prevent any potential security vulnerabilities like injection attacks or unexpected behavior.
  6. Optimization of Session Status Update:

    • Consolidate the session status updates to improve code readability and maintainability. Group related session status updates together for better organization.

Suggestions for Improvement:

  • Provide a more descriptive variable name instead of i to enhance code readability.
  • Remove unused code related to proxy.NewVersionedExtraInfo and its methods.
  • Enhance error handling for decoding ExtraInfo to provide more informative messages.
  • Optimize the session status update process by directly assigning values to the session object.
  • Ensure proper validation of ClientAddr and ProxyAddr to address security concerns.
  • Consider consolidating session status updates for better code organization.

By addressing these points, the code quality can be improved, making it more maintainable and secure.

Here are review comments for file pkg/frontend/routine_manager.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title and Description:

The title of the pull request indicates that it is an enhancement to add client host and proxy host in session status. The body of the pull request specifies that the purpose of this enhancement is to include client host and proxy host in the session status. It references issue #15203.

Changes in routine_manager.go:

The changes in the routine_manager.go file show the addition of setting the clientAddr field of the session to the peer address. This change aims to capture the client's address in the session status.

Feedback and Suggestions:

  1. Security Concerns:

    • Issue: Storing client and proxy host information in session status can potentially expose sensitive information.
    • Suggestion: Ensure that sensitive information like IP addresses are handled securely and consider the implications of storing this data in session status. It's important to follow best practices for handling and storing sensitive data.
  2. Code Optimization:

    • Improvement: Instead of directly setting ses.clientAddr = pro.Peer(), consider adding validation or sanitization checks to the client address before storing it in the session.
    • Suggestion: Implement input validation to ensure that the client address is in the expected format and does not pose a security risk.
  3. Documentation:

    • Improvement: It would be beneficial to update the code comments or documentation to explain why the client and proxy host information is being stored in the session status.
    • Suggestion: Add comments in the code to clarify the purpose of storing client and proxy host information and any security considerations.
  4. Testing:

    • Improvement: Consider adding test cases to validate the behavior of setting and accessing client and proxy host information in the session status.
    • Suggestion: Write unit tests to cover scenarios where client addresses are set and retrieved to ensure the functionality works as expected.
  5. Code Consistency:

    • Improvement: Ensure that the naming conventions for variables like ses and pro are consistent with the rest of the codebase.
    • Suggestion: Follow a consistent naming convention to improve code readability and maintainability.
  6. Code Review:

    • Improvement: It's essential to have a thorough code review to catch any potential security vulnerabilities or logic errors.
    • Suggestion: Request a peer review to ensure that the changes align with the project's coding standards and best practices.

In conclusion, while the enhancement to add client and proxy host information in session status is valuable, it's crucial to address security concerns, optimize the code changes, update documentation, add testing, maintain code consistency, and conduct a comprehensive code review to enhance the overall quality of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file pkg/frontend/session.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request clearly indicates that it is an enhancement related to adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides information about the type of PR, the related issue, and the purpose of the changes made in the PR, which is to add client host and proxy host in session status.

Changes in pkg/frontend/session.go:

  1. Addition of clientAddr and proxyAddr fields in Session struct:

    • Two new fields clientAddr and proxyAddr have been added to the Session struct to store client and proxy host addresses respectively. This is a good addition to capture this information.
  2. Modification in StatusSession function:

    • The StatusSession function has been modified to include clientAddr and proxyAddr in the status.Session struct that is returned. This change allows the client and proxy host addresses to be included in the session status.

Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. Validation for clientAddr and proxyAddr:

    • Ensure that proper validation is done for the clientAddr and proxyAddr fields to prevent any unexpected or malicious input. Consider using validation functions or regular expressions to validate the format of IP addresses.
  2. Consistency in Naming:

    • Consider using consistent naming conventions for variables. For example, clientAddr and proxyAddr could be renamed to clientHost and proxyHost respectively for better clarity and consistency with existing naming conventions.
  3. Documentation Update:

    • It would be beneficial to update the relevant documentation to reflect the changes made in the StatusSession function to include clientHost and proxyHost in the session status.
  4. Optimization:

    • Since the StatusSession function is modified twice, consider refactoring the code to avoid duplication. You could create a helper function to handle the common logic for setting clientHost and proxyHost to improve code maintainability.
  5. Security Considerations:

    • Ensure that sensitive information such as client and proxy host addresses are handled securely. Avoid exposing this information unintentionally in logs or responses that could pose a security risk.

By addressing the above suggestions, the pull request can be enhanced for better code quality, maintainability, and security.

Overall, the changes made in the pull request are valuable for enhancing the session status functionality by including client and proxy host information.

Here are review comments for file pkg/pb/proxy/proxy.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and indicates that it is an enhancement related to adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides information about the type of PR, the related issue, and the purpose of the changes made in the PR. It mentions that the PR is an improvement and specifies the issue it addresses (#15203). The explanation is concise and to the point.

Changes in pkg/pb/proxy/proxy.go:

  1. Unused Code Removal:

    • The pull request removes a significant amount of unused code related to versioning, encoding, decoding, and handling extra information between proxy and cn. This cleanup is beneficial for reducing code complexity and improving maintainability.
  2. Addition of New Functionality:

    • The pull request introduces new functions Encode() and Decode() for ExtraInfo. These functions handle encoding and decoding data, which seems to be related to session status information.
  3. Optimization Opportunity:

    • The Encode() function can be optimized further by directly appending the data to the ret slice without creating a separate buffer and using binary.Write. This can improve performance and simplify the code.
  4. Security Concern - Magic Number:

    • The calculation of size in the readData function using hardcoded indices (0 and 1) to extract bytes from the buffer can be error-prone and lead to potential buffer overflows. It's recommended to use constants or safer methods to extract the size value to prevent security vulnerabilities.
  5. Consistency in Naming:

    • The naming convention for functions like Encode() and Decode() should be consistent across the codebase. It's advisable to ensure uniformity in naming to enhance code readability and maintainability.
  6. Documentation Improvement:

    • While the code changes seem to be focused on functionality, adding or updating comments/documentation for the new functions can help improve code understanding for future developers.

Suggestions:

  • Security Audit: Conduct a thorough security audit to ensure that the changes do not introduce any vulnerabilities, especially related to buffer handling and data encoding/decoding.
  • Optimization: Optimize the Encode() function by directly appending data to the slice without unnecessary buffer operations.
  • Naming Convention: Ensure consistency in naming conventions for functions to maintain code clarity and consistency.
  • Documentation: Add or update comments to explain the purpose and usage of the new functions for better code comprehension.

By addressing the mentioned points and considering the suggestions provided, the pull request can be enhanced in terms of code quality, security, and maintainability.

Here are review comments for file pkg/pb/proxy/proxy_test.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request clearly indicates that it is an enhancement related to adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides information about the type of PR, the specific issue it addresses, and the purpose of the changes made, which is to add client host and proxy host in session status.

Changes in pkg/pb/proxy/proxy_test.go:

  1. Removed License Information: The license information at the beginning of the file has been removed. It's important to ensure that the appropriate license information is retained in all files as required by the project's licensing terms.

  2. Test Functions: The file contains test functions related to version comparison, encoding, decoding, and extra information handling. These tests seem unrelated to the stated purpose of adding client host and proxy host in session status. It's important to maintain code consistency and relevance in test files.

  3. Version Codec Tests: The test functions related to version encoding and decoding are present. These tests ensure the correctness of version handling logic. It's essential to have comprehensive tests for all critical functionalities.

  4. Extra Info Codec Tests: The test functions related to encoding and decoding extra information are present. These tests validate the correctness of handling extra information. Ensuring the accuracy of data encoding and decoding is crucial for the application's reliability.

Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. License Information: Revert the removal of the license information or ensure it is relocated to a separate file if necessary to comply with licensing requirements.

  2. Test Relevance: Review the test functions in proxy_test.go to ensure they are directly related to the changes being made in the pull request. Consider moving unrelated tests to appropriate test files for better organization.

  3. Code Optimization: If the changes in this pull request are solely focused on adding client host and proxy host in session status, ensure that the modifications align with this specific enhancement and do not include unrelated changes.

  4. Security Concerns: While the provided diff does not show any direct security issues, it's crucial to conduct a thorough security review of the entire codebase to identify and address any potential vulnerabilities.

  5. Documentation: Consider updating the relevant documentation to reflect the changes made in this pull request, especially regarding the addition of client host and proxy host in session status.

By addressing these suggestions, the pull request can be optimized for clarity, relevance, and adherence to project standards.

Here are review comments for file pkg/proxy/client_conn.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request clearly indicates that it is an enhancement related to adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides information about the type of PR, the related issue, and the purpose of the changes made, which is to add client host and proxy host in session status.

Changes in pkg/proxy/client_conn.go:

  1. Variable Declaration Improvement:

    • The addition of strconv import is good for later use.
    • The declaration of port variable and parsing the port from RemoteAddress is a good addition for capturing the port number separately.
  2. ClientConn Initialization:

    • Storing the parsed port number in the originPort field of clientInfo struct is a good enhancement for keeping track of the port information.
  3. Connection Handling:

    • Updating clientAddr with both IP and port in connectToBackend method is a good practice for maintaining complete client connection information.
  4. Reading Packet:

    • Updating originPort in clientInfo when receiving ProxyAddr message is a necessary enhancement to keep the port information updated.

Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. Error Handling:

    • Ensure proper error handling for the strconv.Atoi conversion to handle any potential errors.
  2. Code Optimization:

    • Consider consolidating the parsing and storing of IP and port information into a separate function to improve code readability and maintainability.
  3. Consistency:

    • Ensure consistency in variable naming conventions for better code clarity and understanding.
  4. Security Concern:

    • When updating originPort from ProxyAddr, validate the port number to prevent any potential security vulnerabilities like buffer overflows or unexpected behavior.
  5. Testing:

    • Add relevant test cases to cover the new functionality added in this PR to ensure its correctness and prevent regressions.
  6. Documentation:

    • Update the relevant documentation to reflect the changes made in this PR for better code understanding by other developers.

By addressing the above points, the code quality, security, and maintainability of the pkg/proxy/client_conn.go file can be improved.

Here are review comments for file pkg/proxy/label_info.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title and Body:

The title and body of the pull request clearly indicate that this is an enhancement aimed at adding client host and proxy host information in the session status. The PR is categorized as an improvement and references the related issue #15203. The purpose of adding client host and proxy host information is also mentioned, which is helpful for understanding the context of the changes.

Changes in pkg/proxy/label_info.go:

  1. Addition of originPort Field:

    • The addition of the originPort field in the clientInfo struct is a valid enhancement to include the origin port of the client in the session status.
    • Issue: However, it's crucial to ensure that the originPort field is properly validated and sanitized to prevent any potential security vulnerabilities like injection attacks or unexpected behavior due to invalid port values.
    • Suggestion: Implement input validation checks to ensure that the originPort value falls within the valid port range (0-65535) and is of the correct data type (uint16). Additionally, consider sanitizing the input to prevent any malicious input that could lead to security risks.
  2. Code Optimization:

    • The changes made in this pull request seem straightforward and focused on enhancing the existing functionality by adding a new field.
    • Suggestion: Since the changes are minimal, it would be beneficial to include relevant comments or documentation to explain the purpose of the originPort field and how it fits into the overall functionality of the clientInfo struct. This will improve code readability and maintainability for future developers.

Overall Suggestions:

  • Security Considerations: Prioritize security by implementing input validation and sanitization for the new originPort field to prevent security vulnerabilities.
  • Documentation: Enhance the code clarity by adding comments or documentation explaining the purpose and usage of the new originPort field.
  • Testing: Consider adding test cases to validate the behavior of the originPort field under different scenarios to ensure its correctness and robustness.

By addressing the security concerns and enhancing the documentation, the pull request can be further improved to ensure the reliability and security of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file pkg/proxy/router.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and informative, indicating that it is an enhancement to add client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides relevant information about the type of PR, the issue it fixes, and the purpose of the changes made. It specifies that the PR adds client host and proxy host in session status to address issue #15203.

Changes in pkg/proxy/router.go:

  1. Addition of clientAddr field:

    • The pull request adds a new field clientAddr of type string to the CNServer struct to store the real client address.
    • This addition is necessary to include the client address in the session status information.
  2. Modification of ExtraInfo struct initialization:

    • The initialization of the ExtraInfo struct has been modified to include the ClientAddr field with the real client address.
    • The change ensures that the client address is properly included in the encoded information.

Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. Consistency in Field Naming:

    • Ensure consistency in naming conventions for fields. For example, if the existing fields use camelCase naming, maintain the same convention for the new field clientAddr.
  2. Error Handling:

    • Consider adding error handling for cases where the clientAddr is not provided or is invalid to prevent unexpected behavior.
  3. Validation of Client Address:

    • Validate the clientAddr input to ensure it contains a valid client address format to prevent potential security vulnerabilities like injection attacks.
  4. Documentation:

    • Update relevant documentation to reflect the addition of the clientAddr field and its significance in the session status information.
  5. Optimization:

    • If applicable, consider optimizing the encoding process to improve performance, especially if this operation is critical for the application's efficiency.
  6. Testing:

    • Ensure comprehensive testing is conducted to validate the functionality of the added clientAddr field and its integration into the session status information.

By addressing the suggestions mentioned above, the pull request can be enhanced to improve code quality, maintain consistency, and ensure the security and reliability of the application.

Here are review comments for file pkg/sql/colexec/table_function/processlist.go:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and informative, indicating that it is an enhancement related to adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides relevant information about the type of PR, the associated issue, and the purpose of the changes made in the PR. It specifies that the PR is an improvement and addresses issue #15203 by adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Changes:

The changes made in the processlist.go file involve adding functionality to include the proxy host in the session status. Specifically, the code snippet shows the addition of a case for status.SessionField_PROXY_HOST where the proxy host information is retrieved from the session and appended to the corresponding vector.

Feedback and Suggestions:

  1. Security Concern - Data Sanitization:

    • When dealing with sensitive information like host details, it is crucial to ensure that the data is properly sanitized to prevent potential security vulnerabilities such as injection attacks.
    • It is recommended to validate and sanitize the input data (client host and proxy host) before appending it to the vector to mitigate any security risks.
  2. Error Handling:

    • The error handling in the code snippet is appropriate, but it would be beneficial to provide more context in the error messages for better troubleshooting and debugging.
    • Consider including descriptive error messages that specify the nature of the error encountered during the data appending process.
  3. Code Optimization:

    • Since the changes involve a straightforward addition of the proxy host information, the code seems concise and well-structured.
    • To optimize the code further, ensure that the logic for retrieving and appending the proxy host information is efficient and follows best practices.
  4. Code Documentation:

    • It is essential to maintain clear and concise code documentation to aid in understanding the purpose and functionality of the added code.
    • Consider adding comments or documentation to explain the rationale behind including the client host and proxy host in the session status.
  5. Testing:

    • Verify that the changes made in the PR are adequately tested to ensure the correct functionality of the added features.
    • Include relevant test cases to cover scenarios related to client host and proxy host information retrieval and appending.
  6. Review and Collaboration:

    • Encourage collaboration and feedback from team members to review the changes and provide additional insights or suggestions for improvement.
    • Conduct thorough code reviews to address any potential issues or enhancements that could further enhance the codebase.

Conclusion:

Overall, the pull request appears to be a valuable enhancement that adds client host and proxy host information to the session status. By addressing the security concerns, enhancing error handling, optimizing the code, documenting the changes, and ensuring thorough testing, the codebase can be improved in terms of functionality, security, and maintainability. Collaborative efforts and attention to detail will contribute to the successful integration of these enhancements.

Here are review comments for file proto/proxy.proto:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and concise, indicating that it is an enhancement to add client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides relevant information about the type of PR, the related issue, and the purpose of the changes. It specifies that the PR is an improvement and addresses issue #15203 by adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Changes in proto/proxy.proto:

  1. Addition of ClientAddr field in ExtraInfo message:

    • The pull request adds a new field ClientAddr of type string to the ExtraInfo message in the proxy.proto file.
    • Issue: The addition of ClientAddr without proper validation or sanitization can pose security risks such as injection attacks.
    • Suggestion: Ensure that the ClientAddr field is properly validated and sanitized to prevent any security vulnerabilities. Consider using input validation functions or sanitization techniques to handle user input securely.
  2. Other Changes:

    • The pull request also includes other fields like Salt, InternalConn, ConnectionID, and Label in the ExtraInfo message.
    • Optimization: Since the focus of this PR is to add client host and proxy host in session status, it is recommended to keep the changes specific to this enhancement. Unrelated changes should be separated into different PRs to maintain code clarity and ease of review.

General Suggestions:

  1. Security Concerns:

    • Always validate and sanitize user inputs to prevent security vulnerabilities like injection attacks.
    • Consider implementing input validation mechanisms to ensure data integrity and security.
  2. Code Optimization:

    • Focus on making changes that are directly related to the enhancement mentioned in the title and body of the PR.
    • Separate unrelated changes into distinct PRs to maintain code modularity and improve review efficiency.
  3. Documentation:

    • Ensure that any new fields or changes are properly documented to aid developers in understanding the codebase.

By addressing the security concerns, optimizing the changes, and maintaining code clarity, the pull request can be enhanced to improve the overall quality of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file proto/status.proto:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request clearly indicates that it is an enhancement related to adding client host and proxy host in session status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides information about the type of PR, the issue it fixes, and a brief description of the changes made.

Changes:

  1. Added a new enum value PROXY_HOST in the SessionField enum in status.proto.
  2. Added a new field ProxyHost in the Session message in status.proto.

Feedback and Suggestions:

  1. Consistency in Naming Convention:

    • Ensure consistency in naming conventions. For example, ProxyHost should be named following the same convention as other fields in the Session message (e.g., ClientHost).
  2. Documentation:

    • Add comments/documentation to explain the purpose of the new field ProxyHost in the Session message for better code understanding.
  3. Validation:

    • Consider adding validation checks for the ProxyHost field to ensure it contains a valid host address format.
  4. Security Concerns:

    • Validate and sanitize the ProxyHost input to prevent potential security vulnerabilities like injection attacks.
    • Ensure that the ProxyHost field is not exposed unintentionally to unauthorized users.
  5. Optimization:

    • If applicable, consider consolidating related changes into a single commit for better code management and review.
  6. Testing:

    • Write unit tests to cover the new functionality added in this PR to ensure it works as expected and does not introduce regressions.
  7. Review Code Style:

    • Check if the code formatting aligns with the project's coding standards and make necessary adjustments if needed.
  8. Version Control:

    • Ensure that the changes made in this PR are in line with the project's version control practices and guidelines.

By addressing the above points, the pull request can be improved in terms of code quality, security, and maintainability.

@sukki37
Copy link
Contributor

sukki37 commented Apr 6, 2024

@Mergifyio refresh

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Apr 6, 2024

refresh

✅ Pull request refreshed

@mergify mergify bot merged commit b13c590 into matrixorigin:1.1-dev Apr 6, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement size/M Denotes a PR that changes [100,499] lines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants