pick 'chore: stable bvt case result abort statement query_type' in 1.1

[xzxiong]

What type of PR is this?

• API-change
• BUG
• Improvement
• Documentation
• Feature
• Test and CI
• Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue ##15469

ref: #14569

What this PR does / why we need it:

changes:

1. stable bvt case result abort statement query_type

[matrix-meow]

@xzxiong Thanks for your contributions!

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/regression.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords that may not provide a concise summary of the changes being made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and focused title that accurately reflects the purpose of the pull request.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context on the changes being made, including the type of PR, related issues, and a brief description of the changes. It would be helpful to provide more detailed information on why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the identified issues or improvements.

Changes:

1. The changes in the regression.result file involve adding SQL statements related to creating tables, views, loading data, and performing operations like insert, update, delete, and rollback.

Issues/Problems:

1. Security Risk - Hardcoded Credentials:

   • The use of hardcoded credentials (ADMIN_NAME 'admin' IDENTIFIED BY '123456') in the SQL statements poses a security risk. Storing sensitive information like passwords directly in code or scripts is not recommended as it can lead to potential security breaches. It is advisable to use secure methods like environment variables or configuration files to manage credentials securely.

2. Data Sensitivity:

   • The SQL statements include sensitive data such as account names and passwords. It is crucial to handle and store sensitive data securely to prevent unauthorized access or leaks. Consider using encryption or secure storage mechanisms for sensitive information.

3. Redundant Operations:

   • The repeated drop account if exists bvt_query_type_reg; statement at the beginning and end of the script seems redundant. It may be unnecessary to drop the account twice unless there are specific requirements for doing so. Consider reviewing the necessity of this operation to avoid unnecessary actions.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Credential Management:

   • Avoid hardcoding credentials in the code. Utilize secure methods for managing sensitive information, such as using environment variables or a secure credential store.

2. Data Protection:

   • Ensure that sensitive data is handled securely and consider implementing encryption or secure storage mechanisms to protect sensitive information.

3. Optimization:

   • Review the script to eliminate redundant operations and optimize the sequence of SQL statements for efficiency and clarity.

4. Documentation:

   • Provide detailed explanations in the pull request description about why these specific changes are necessary and how they contribute to addressing the identified issues.

By addressing the security concerns, optimizing the script, and providing more detailed context in the pull request description, the overall quality and security of the codebase can be improved.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/regression.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of different keywords. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly conveys the purpose of the changes being made.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes being made, including the type of PR, the related issues, and a brief description of the changes. It would be helpful to provide more detailed information about why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the identified issues.

Changes:

1. The changes in the regression.sql file include adding SQL statements related to creating accounts, databases, tables, views, loading data, updating, deleting, and cleaning up.
2. The SQL script seems to be related to testing different query types and scenarios.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity: Consider revising the title to be more specific and focused on the actual changes being made, such as "Add SQL statements for testing query types in regression.sql".

2. Body Details: Provide a more detailed explanation in the body of the pull request about why these specific SQL statements are being added and how they contribute to resolving the mentioned issues.

3. Security Concerns: Ensure that sensitive information like passwords (e.g., '123456') is not hardcoded in the script. Consider using environment variables or secure storage mechanisms for such data.

4. Optimization: Check if there are any repetitive or redundant SQL statements in the script that can be consolidated or optimized for better performance.

5. Documentation: Consider adding comments within the SQL script to explain the purpose of each section or SQL statement for better understanding and maintainability.

6. Testing: Verify that the added SQL statements cover all the necessary test cases and scenarios to ensure comprehensive testing.

7. Cleanup: Ensure that any temporary resources created during testing, like accounts or databases, are properly cleaned up at the end of the script to avoid cluttering the environment.

By addressing these points, the pull request can be improved in terms of clarity, security, efficiency, and maintainability of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_1.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is unclear and seems to contain a mix of keywords related to the changes being made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly conveys the purpose of the changes.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes being made, including referencing related issues and explaining the specific modifications. It would be helpful to include more details about why these changes are necessary and how they address the identified issue.

Changes:

1. The changes made in the statement_query_type_1.result file are extensive and involve creating, dropping, and manipulating database objects like tables, views, triggers, procedures, roles, users, accounts, and more.
2. Some statements in the changes indicate potential security issues, such as "internal error: do not have privilege to execute the statement" and "administrative command is unsupported in transactions."
3. Redundancy can be observed in the repeated creation and dropping of databases, tables, views, and other objects.
4. The use of sensitive information like passwords ('123456', '111'), admin names, and user names in plain text should be avoided for security reasons.
5. Some statements like granting and revoking privileges, creating roles, and users are flagged as unsupported in transactions, which may need further investigation.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title: Update the title to be more descriptive, such as "Fixing Security Vulnerabilities and Redundancies in statement_query_type_1.result."
2. Body: Provide a more detailed explanation of the changes, including how they address the identified issues and why they are necessary.
3. Changes:
   • Address the security issues by avoiding plain text passwords and sensitive information in the code.
   • Review the statements flagged as unsupported in transactions and ensure they are handled correctly.
   • Consider optimizing the code by removing redundant operations like repeated creation and dropping of objects.
   • Implement best practices for database object management to improve security and efficiency.
   • Consider modularizing the code to improve readability and maintainability.
4. Security: Implement secure coding practices such as parameterized queries, encryption for sensitive data, and least privilege access control.
5. Testing: Ensure thorough testing of the changes to validate their functionality and security aspects.
6. Documentation: Update the documentation to reflect any changes made and provide clear instructions for future developers.

By addressing these suggestions, the pull request can be enhanced to improve the quality, security, and efficiency of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_1.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords related to the changes being made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly conveys the purpose of the changes.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes being made, including the type of PR (BUG), the related issues, and a brief description of the changes. It would be helpful to provide more detailed information about why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the bug.

Changes:

1. The changes in the statement_query_type_1.sql file are extensive and involve creating, manipulating, and dropping databases, tables, views, accounts, roles, users, and more.
2. The script includes various SQL statements for testing different types of SQL queries and operations.
3. The script also includes transaction-related SQL statements and cleanup operations.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity: Update the title to be more descriptive and focused on the actual changes being made, such as "Add SQL test cases for statement_query_type".

2. Body Details: Provide a more detailed explanation in the body of the pull request about how these changes specifically address the bug mentioned and why they are necessary.

3. Code Optimization:

   • Modularization: Consider breaking down the large SQL script into smaller, more modular scripts for better readability and maintainability.
   • Parameterization: Where possible, use parameterized queries instead of hardcoding values in SQL statements to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities.
   • Transaction Handling: Ensure proper transaction handling to maintain data integrity and consistency.
   • End of File: Add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to coding standards.

4. Security Concerns:

   • Sensitive Information: Avoid hardcoding sensitive information like passwords in scripts. Consider using environment variables or secure storage mechanisms.
   • SQL Injection: Validate and sanitize user inputs to prevent SQL injection attacks.
   • Access Control: Review the access control permissions granted in the script to ensure they follow the principle of least privilege.

5. Testing Considerations:

   • Test Coverage: Ensure that the test cases cover a wide range of scenarios to validate the functionality thoroughly.
   • Repeatability: Make sure the test cases are designed to be repeatable and do not have unintended side effects.

By addressing these suggestions, the code quality, security, and maintainability of the changes can be improved, leading to a more robust and reliable codebase.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_2.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords that might be related to the changes made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly indicates the purpose of the changes.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes made, including the type of PR, the issues fixed, and a brief description of the changes. It is good to see the reference to the related issues and a summary of the modifications.

Changes:

1. The changes in the file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_2.result are extensive and seem to be related to setting up a test scenario with various SQL statements and queries.
2. The file includes SQL statements for creating databases, tables, views, triggers, procedures, accounts, roles, users, granting and revoking privileges, as well as executing queries and transactions.
3. Some statements like creating accounts and dropping databases show "internal error: do not have privilege to execute the statement", which might indicate a potential security issue.
4. The file ends with dropping an account, which seems to be a repetition of an earlier statement.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity: Consider revising the title to be more specific and indicative of the actual changes made in the pull request.

2. Security Concerns: Review the statements that show "internal error: do not have privilege to execute the statement" as this could indicate a security vulnerability. Ensure that only authorized users have the necessary privileges to execute sensitive operations.

3. Optimization:

   • Check for any redundant or unnecessary statements in the test scenario setup.
   • Ensure that the test scenario covers all necessary cases without unnecessary duplication.
   • Consider breaking down the test scenario into smaller, more focused parts for better readability and maintainability.

4. Documentation: Add comments or explanations within the test scenario file to clarify the purpose of each SQL statement and improve readability for future reference.

5. Testing: Verify that the test scenario covers all relevant use cases and edge cases to ensure comprehensive testing of the system's functionality.

By addressing the security concerns, optimizing the test scenario setup, and improving documentation, the quality and effectiveness of the changes in the pull request can be enhanced.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_2.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords that might be related to the changes made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly conveys the purpose of the changes.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes being made, including the type of PR, the related issues, and a brief description of the changes. It would be helpful to provide more detailed information about why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the issues mentioned.

Changes:

1. The changes in the statement_query_type_2.sql file include adding a series of SQL statements for testing various functionalities related to database operations.
2. The script includes creating accounts, databases, tables, views, indexes, executing queries, and performing other database operations.
3. The script also includes cleanup steps at the end to drop the created accounts.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Security Concerns:

   • The script contains hardcoded sensitive information like passwords (IDENTIFIED BY '123456') which is a security risk. It's recommended to avoid storing sensitive data directly in scripts.
   • Consider using environment variables or a secure vault to store and retrieve sensitive information securely.

2. Code Optimization:

   • The script seems to contain a large number of repetitive SQL statements. Consider refactoring the script to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.
   • Group similar operations together to improve readability and maintainability.

3. Documentation:

   • Add comments to explain the purpose of each section of the script for better understanding by other developers and for future reference.

4. Testing:

   • Ensure that the script is thoroughly tested to validate the functionality of the database operations being performed.

5. Cleanup:

   • Verify that the cleanup steps at the end of the script are effective in removing all created entities to avoid cluttering the database.

6. Version Control:

   • Ensure that the changes made in the script align with the version control guidelines and best practices of the project.

By addressing the security concerns, optimizing the code, improving documentation, thorough testing, and ensuring effective cleanup, the quality and maintainability of the codebase can be enhanced.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain some unnecessary information. It would be better to have a more concise and descriptive title that clearly conveys the purpose of the changes being made.

Body:

The body of the pull request is informative, providing details about the type of PR, the related issues, and what the PR aims to achieve. However, it could be improved by providing more context on why these specific changes are necessary and how they contribute to the project.

Changes:

1. The changes made in the file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.result are extensive and involve creating, modifying, and dropping database objects, as well as executing various SQL statements.
2. The file contains a mix of SQL queries, comments, and result outputs related to database operations and queries.
3. The file includes sensitive information such as account creation with passwords and internal error messages which could pose security risks if exposed.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity: Consider revising the title to be more descriptive and focused on the specific changes being made, for better clarity.

2. Body Details: Provide more context in the body of the pull request to explain the significance of the changes and how they align with the project goals.

3. Security Concerns:

   • Avoid including sensitive information like passwords in the codebase.
   • Internal error messages should not be exposed in the codebase as they can provide insights into the system's vulnerabilities.
   • Ensure that any account creation or privilege-related operations are handled securely and do not expose sensitive data.

4. Code Optimization:

   • Consider breaking down the changes into smaller, more manageable chunks for better readability and maintainability.
   • Remove any redundant or unnecessary comments or queries to streamline the file and improve its clarity.

5. Testing: Ensure that the changes made in the file are thoroughly tested to validate their functionality and prevent any unintended consequences.

By addressing the security concerns, optimizing the code changes, and providing more context in the PR body, the overall quality and security of the codebase can be improved.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords and phrases that may not provide a meaningful summary of the changes being made.

Body:

The body of the pull request contains information about the type of PR, the related issues, and a brief description of the changes made. It is good that the PR is linked to specific issues for tracking purposes.

Changes:

1. The changes in the file test/distributed/cases/statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.sql involve adding a series of SQL statements for testing various functionalities related to database operations and queries.

Feedback:

1. Title Clarity:

   • The title of the pull request should be more descriptive and concise, focusing on the actual changes being made. It should clearly indicate the purpose of the PR.

2. Security Concerns:

   • The SQL statements in the added file seem to contain sensitive information such as account names, passwords, and database operations. It is crucial to avoid hardcoding sensitive data in SQL files as they can be exposed and pose security risks. Consider using placeholders or external configuration files for such data.

3. Code Optimization:

   • The SQL statements in the added file are extensive and may benefit from refactoring to improve readability and maintainability. Consider breaking down the statements into smaller, more modular components for better organization.

4. Testing Consideration:

   • Ensure that the added SQL statements cover a comprehensive set of test cases to validate the functionality thoroughly. Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each test case for better understanding.

5. Cleanup Operations:

   • It is essential to include cleanup operations after running the test cases to ensure the environment is left in a consistent state. Verify that all created resources are properly removed to avoid conflicts in subsequent tests.

6. Documentation:

   • Consider adding inline comments or a separate documentation section to explain the rationale behind each test case and the expected outcomes. This will help future developers understand the purpose of the tests.

Overall, the pull request needs improvements in terms of title clarity, security handling, code optimization, testing coverage, cleanup operations, and documentation. By addressing these areas, the quality and maintainability of the codebase can be significantly enhanced.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_1.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain some unnecessary information. It mentions picking a specific chore related to stable BVT case result abort statement query type in version 1.1.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes made and the type of PR it is (BUG fix). It also references the related issues and explains the purpose of the PR which is to modify the stable BVT case result abort statement query type.

Changes Made:

The changes made in the pull request involve adding a significant amount of SQL queries to the file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_1.result. These queries seem to be related to testing various SQL statements and operations.

Feedback and Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity:

   • The title of the pull request should be more descriptive and concise. It should clearly indicate the purpose of the changes being made without unnecessary details.

2. Security Concerns:

   • The SQL queries added in the file should not contain sensitive information like passwords or credentials. Ensure that any sensitive data is not exposed in the queries.

3. Code Optimization:

   • The added SQL queries seem repetitive and could be optimized by grouping similar queries together or using loops where applicable to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.

4. Code Consistency:

   • Ensure consistency in naming conventions and formatting of the SQL queries to maintain readability and clarity across the file.

5. Testing:

   • It would be beneficial to include test cases for the added SQL queries to ensure they are functioning as expected and to prevent regressions in the future.

6. Documentation:

   • Consider adding comments or documentation within the file to explain the purpose of each group of SQL queries for better understanding by other developers.

7. Review Process:

   • Encourage peer review of the changes to gather feedback on the added SQL queries and to ensure they align with the project's standards and requirements.

By addressing the mentioned points, the pull request can be improved in terms of clarity, security, efficiency, and maintainability of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_1.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords that might be related to the changes being made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly indicates the purpose of the changes.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes being made, including the type of PR, the related issues, and a brief description of the changes. It would be helpful to provide more detailed information about why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the issues mentioned.

Changes:

1. The changes in the statement_query_type_1.sql file involve adding SQL comments and a SQL query for result checking at the end of a test case.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity: Consider revising the title to be more descriptive and focused on the actual changes being made, for example: "Add result checking SQL query to statement_query_type_1.sql".

2. Body Details: Provide a more detailed explanation in the body of the pull request about why the result checking query is necessary and how it improves the stability or reliability of the test case.

3. Security Concern: Ensure that the SQL query for result checking does not expose sensitive information or create a security vulnerability. Avoid querying or displaying confidential data in test cases.

4. Optimization: If possible, consider consolidating or optimizing the SQL query for result checking to improve efficiency and readability. For instance, using appropriate indexing or optimizing the query structure.

5. Consistency: Ensure that the comments added in the SQL file are clear, consistent, and follow any established conventions for documentation within the codebase.

By addressing these points, the pull request can be enhanced in terms of clarity, security, and efficiency, ultimately improving the overall quality of the codebase.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_2.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of keywords related to the changes being made. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly indicates the purpose of the changes.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides some context about the changes being made, including the type of PR, the related issues, and a brief description of the changes. It would be helpful to provide more detailed information about why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the issues mentioned.

Changes:

1. The changes made in the statement_query_type_2.result file involve adding a SQL query that selects data from system.statement_info table based on certain conditions. The query includes columns like statement, query_type, and sql_source_type.
2. The SQL statements added include various operations like drop, use, truncate, delete, explain, select, update, insert, show, create, deallocate, execute, set, prepare, with, values, revoke, grant, rollback, start transaction, commit, begin, etc.

Suggestions for Improvement:

1. Title Clarity: Consider revising the title to be more descriptive and focused on the specific changes being made, such as "Add SQL query for retrieving statement info in system.statement_info table".

2. Body Details: Provide a more detailed explanation in the body of the pull request about why these changes are necessary, how they address the related issues, and what impact they will have on the codebase.

3. Security Concerns: Ensure that sensitive information like passwords or credentials are not exposed in the code or the changes being made. It's important to handle such information securely.

4. Code Optimization: Consider optimizing the SQL queries for better performance, readability, and maintainability. This could involve using parameterized queries, proper indexing, and structuring the queries more efficiently.

5. Consistency: Ensure consistency in naming conventions, formatting, and commenting within the SQL queries to improve code readability and maintainability.

6. Testing: It would be beneficial to include test cases for the added SQL queries to ensure they function as expected and do not introduce any regressions.

By addressing these points, the pull request can be enhanced in terms of clarity, security, performance, and overall code quality.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_2.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not very clear and seems to contain a mix of different keywords. It would be beneficial to have a more descriptive and concise title that clearly indicates the purpose of the changes being made.

Body:

The body of the pull request is brief and provides some context about the changes being made. It includes information about the type of PR, the related issues, and a summary of the changes. However, it could be improved by providing more detailed information about why these specific changes are necessary and how they address the identified issue.

Changes:

The changes made in the pull request involve adding a SQL query to a test file (statement_query_type_2.sql) for checking the result at the end of a BVT (Build Verification Test). The added SQL query checks the result of a specific statement query type.

Feedback and Suggestions:

1. Title Clarity:

   • Consider revising the title to be more descriptive and focused on the actual changes being made. For example, "Add SQL query for result verification in statement_query_type_2.sql".

2. Body Details:

   • Provide a more detailed explanation in the body of the pull request about why this specific SQL query is necessary for the BVT and how it improves the testing process.

3. SQL Query Security:

   • Ensure that the SQL query added for result checking does not introduce any security vulnerabilities such as SQL injection. Validate user inputs and sanitize them before using them in the query to prevent potential attacks.

4. Optimization:

   • Consider optimizing the SQL query for better performance, especially if it is being used in a test scenario. Ensure that the query is efficient and does not impact the overall test execution time significantly.

5. Code Quality:

   • Check for any potential code formatting issues or inconsistencies in the added SQL query to maintain code quality standards.

6. Testing:

   • Verify that the added SQL query accurately checks the expected results and covers all relevant scenarios in the BVT process.

By addressing the points mentioned above, the pull request can be improved in terms of clarity, security, performance, and overall code quality.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.result:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is not clear and seems to contain unnecessary information. It should be more concise and descriptive to indicate the purpose of the changes being made.

Body:

The body of the pull request is informative, providing details about the changes being made and referencing related issues. However, it could be improved by providing more context on why these specific changes are necessary.

Changes:

1. The changes made in the file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.result involve adding SQL queries related to statement, query type, and SQL source type.
2. The queries include various operations like select, drop, create, show, grant, revoke, explain, delete, update, insert, truncate, rollback, commit, etc.

Problems:

1. Security Concerns: The SQL queries in the file seem to contain sensitive information such as passwords (identified by '******') and account details. Storing passwords in plain text in SQL queries is a security risk and should be avoided. It is recommended to use secure methods for handling passwords, such as encryption or parameterized queries.

2. Redundancy: There are multiple instances of similar queries being repeated in the file, which can lead to maintenance issues in the future. It is advisable to refactor the code to reduce redundancy and improve code maintainability.

3. Lack of Comments: The SQL queries lack comments or explanations, making it difficult for other developers to understand the purpose of each query. Adding comments to clarify the intent of the queries would enhance code readability and maintainability.

Suggestions:

1. Security Enhancement: Avoid storing passwords in plain text within SQL queries. Consider using secure methods like environment variables or secure storage mechanisms to handle sensitive information.

2. Code Refactoring: Identify and consolidate repeated queries into reusable functions or stored procedures to reduce redundancy and improve code maintainability.

3. Documentation: Add comments above each SQL query to explain its purpose, inputs, and expected outputs. This will help developers understand the code more easily.

Optimization:

To optimize the changes made in the pull request:

• Consider modularizing the SQL queries into separate files based on functionality or entity to improve organization and readability.
• Implement parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection attacks and enhance security.
• Perform a thorough review of the entire file to identify any other potential security vulnerabilities or areas for code optimization.

By addressing the security concerns, reducing redundancy, adding comments for clarity, and optimizing the code changes, the overall quality and security of the codebase can be significantly improved.

Here are review comments for file test/distributed/cases/zz_statement_query_type/statement_query_type_3.sql:

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is unclear and contains unnecessary information. It should be more concise and descriptive to reflect the actual changes being made.

Body:

The body of the pull request is brief and lacks detailed information about the changes being made. It would be beneficial to provide more context on why the specific changes are necessary and how they address the mentioned issues.

Changes:

1. The changes made in the statement_query_type_3.sql file involve adding a SQL query to check the result at the end of a BVT (Build Verification Test) process.

Feedback and Suggestions:

1. Title Improvement: Consider revising the title to be more descriptive and concise, focusing on the actual changes being made, such as "Add SQL query for BVT result verification in statement_query_type_3.sql".

2. Body Enhancement: Provide a more detailed explanation in the body of the pull request, explaining why the changes are necessary and how they address the identified issues ([Bug]: Regression Error bvt/statement_query_type in 1.1 #15469 and chore: stable bvt case result abort statement query_type #14569).

3. Security Concern: The SQL query added in the statement_query_type_3.sql file should be reviewed for potential SQL injection vulnerabilities. Ensure that user inputs are properly sanitized or parameterized to prevent SQL injection attacks.

4. Code Optimization: Consider breaking down the SQL query into smaller, more readable parts or adding comments to explain the purpose of each condition for better code maintainability.

5. Testing: Ensure that the added SQL query is thoroughly tested to verify its correctness and effectiveness in checking the BVT results as intended.

6. Documentation: Update any relevant documentation to reflect the changes made in the statement_query_type_3.sql file for better code understanding and maintenance.

By addressing the points mentioned above, the pull request can be improved in terms of clarity, security, and overall code quality.