Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rmTag15901(1.2-dev) #16592

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

rmTag15901(1.2-dev) #16592

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

Ariznawlll
Copy link
Contributor

@Ariznawlll Ariznawlll commented Jun 3, 2024

User description

What type of PR is this?

  • API-change
  • BUG
  • Improvement
  • Documentation
  • Feature
  • Test and CI
  • Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue ##15901

What this PR does / why we need it:

rm -rf tag 15901


PR Type

Tests


Description

  • Removed trailing spaces from snapshot results in snapshotRead.result.
  • Updated snapshot timestamps and database IDs in snapshotRead.result.
  • Added new columns to snapshot queries in snapshotRead.result.
  • Adjusted snapshot creation and table insertion sequences in both snapshotRead.result and snapshotRead.sql.
  • Removed issue-specific comments from snapshot creation queries in snapshotRead.sql.
  • Removed redundant snapshot drop commands in snapshotRead.sql.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Tests
snapshotRead.result
Update snapshot results and clean up formatting                   

test/distributed/cases/snapshot/snapshotRead.result

  • Removed trailing spaces from snapshot results.
  • Updated snapshot timestamps and database IDs.
  • Added new columns to snapshot queries.
  • Adjusted snapshot creation and table insertion sequences.
  • +50/-40 
    snapshotRead.sql
    Clean up snapshot creation queries and comments                   

    test/distributed/cases/snapshot/snapshotRead.sql

  • Removed issue-specific comments from snapshot creation queries.
  • Adjusted snapshot creation and table insertion sequences.
  • Removed redundant snapshot drop commands.
  • +2/-13   

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    3, because the PR involves multiple changes in snapshot management and database records, which requires careful review to ensure data consistency and correctness. The changes are spread across multiple snapshots and involve updates to timestamps, database IDs, and the addition of new columns. Reviewing these changes requires understanding the context and the impact on the system's behavior.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    Yes

    ⚡ Possible issues

    Data Consistency: The changes in timestamps and database IDs could affect data consistency if not handled correctly across different environments or if the snapshots are used in concurrent processes.

    Regression Potential: Adjustments in snapshot creation and table insertion sequences could introduce regressions if existing dependencies or assumptions in the codebase are not considered.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    @matrix-meow matrix-meow added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes [100,499] lines label Jun 3, 2024
    @mergify mergify bot requested a review from sukki37 June 3, 2024 06:10
    Copy link

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Use IF EXISTS when dropping the table to prevent errors if the table does not exist

    Ensure that the snapshot sp06 is dropped even if the table cluster01 does not exist, to
    avoid potential errors during cleanup.

    test/distributed/cases/snapshot/snapshotRead.sql [296-297]

    -drop table cluster01;
    +drop table if exists cluster01;
     drop snapshot sp06;
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential error scenario where the table might not exist when attempting to drop it, which could lead to errors during cleanup. Adding IF EXISTS improves robustness.

    7
    Use IF EXISTS when dropping the snapshot and table to prevent errors if they do not exist

    Add a check to ensure that the snapshot binary is dropped even if the table t1 does not
    exist, to avoid potential errors during cleanup.

    test/distributed/cases/snapshot/snapshotRead.sql [442-443]

    -drop snapshot `binary`;
    -drop table t1;
    +drop snapshot if exists `binary`;
    +drop table if exists t1;
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion correctly addresses the potential issue of dropping a snapshot and table that might not exist, which could cause errors. The use of IF EXISTS is a good practice in such scenarios to ensure cleaner and error-free code execution.

    7
    Use IF EXISTS when dropping the snapshot to prevent errors if it does not exist

    Ensure that the snapshot sp08 is dropped even if it does not exist, to avoid potential
    errors during cleanup.

    test/distributed/cases/snapshot/snapshotRead.sql [542]

    -drop snapshot sp08;
    +drop snapshot if exists sp08;
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion is valid as it addresses the potential error of trying to drop a snapshot that may not exist. Using IF EXISTS helps avoid such errors, ensuring the cleanup process is error-free.

    7

    @mergify mergify bot added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Jun 3, 2024
    @mergify mergify bot merged commit 895325d into matrixorigin:1.2-dev Jun 3, 2024
    18 checks passed
    @aylei aylei mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    kind/bug Something isn't working Review effort [1-5]: 3 size/M Denotes a PR that changes [100,499] lines Tests
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants