Sync frequently used stickers with current available packs #58
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, there are two instances where the storage of frequently used stickers gets out of sync with available packs :
index.jsonfileThis means stickers in the "Frequently used" list can have out of date metadatas, and sending them from this list or from the pack can lead to a different sent event. This also means, and that's even more confusing, that a sticker can be found in this list, when it is no longer found in any pack.
These changes aim to properly refresh the list of frequently used with the currently available packs, as well as the current metadatas of the available packs, in order to keep them in sync, and make it less confusing to users.
This also adds a button to clear the frequently used list, for people who may need to, since access to the storage is not the simplest thing.