Set RestrictMessageSending in portal create+update #232
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #228
Bridge didn't set the power level for message sending correctly when the bridge user is invited to a WA-group that was already set to 'announce'-mode (=only admins can send message).
It did already bridge it correctly when the setting is toggled while we're in the group. (Using ChatUpdate with ChatActionType Announce)
In this patch I've added a call to RestrictMessageSending in CreateMatrixRoom which should fix it for new groups bridge users join. I could have also added a state event in the initialState slice, instead of calling RestrictMessageSending separately, but that would make it more complex imo. Let you know if you'd want me to change it.
The extra call to RestrictMessageSending in UpdateMetadata is included to fix it for existing groups as well. Works perfectly here!
With best regards,
Remi