-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
discuss different logics for rotation #441
Comments
Nice! Thanks, Max.
Any thoughts in including the logic of oblique rotations like centriod for when the statements have clear correlations? (sorry to bring that back, I'm just following your excellent progress!)
Jeremy
…---------- Original Message ----------
From: Maximilian Held <notifications@github.com>
To: maxheld83/pensieve <pensieve@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Subject: [maxheld83/pensieve] discuss different logics for rotation (#441)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:40:51 -0700
—You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
____________________________________________________________
Drink This Before Bed, Watch Your Body Fat Melt Like Crazy
wisemed.life
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5bd1b7d33624b37d26accst01duc
|
Hi Jeremy, sorry I'm not sure I fully get the question. |
Hi Max,
I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I was asking if the logic of oblique rotations was going to be included since they are very useful in certain situations, such as when statements have inherent correlations and/or overlap.
As you point out, those rotations are more difficult and complicated, so I'm glad they remain on the roadmap. Great progress on the Pensieve framework so far!
Jeremy
…---------- Original Message ----------
From: Maximilian Held <notifications@github.com>
To: maxheld83/pensieve <pensieve@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Jeremy <awiggin@juno.com>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [maxheld83/pensieve] discuss different logics for rotation (#441)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Jeremy, sorry I'm not sure I fully get the question.
Oblique rotations are also on the roadmap, but are probably a ways off (they make interpretation and some of the customarily used plots really difficult).
—You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
____________________________________________________________
We Say Goodbye To Kathie Lee Gifford
track.volutrk.com
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5bd2120ab6cfc120a0406st02duc
|
definitely! I'm tracking support for oblique rotations in #442 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: