chore: first time setup updates: poetry in .tool-versions and dynamodb file in .gitignore

[meagharty]

Summary of changes

Asana Ticket: No ticket

• Add poetry back to .tool-versions
  If poetry was intentionally removed from .tool-versions, I could instead update the README to remove the line Run asdf plugin-add poetry to add Poetry plugin.

• Add local dynamodb metadata file to .gitignore

• NOTE on undocumented step: For the local dynamoDB setup, I needed to install java on my machine. I installed java globally via asdf. I didn't add instructions to the api_accounts/README but I could if anyone felt strongly about it.

[github-actions]

Coverage of commit f1774e2

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 89.2% (4129 of 4631 lines)
  functions..: 70.9% (2231 of 3145 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

Download coverage report

[nlwstein]

@meagharty This is totally not blocking but I have found it helpful to run the dynamodb in Docker - a simple version being docker run -p 8000:8000 amazon/dynamodb-local but you could preserve the data in a volume if you wanted to as well.

[meagharty]

@meagharty This is totally not blocking but I have found it helpful to run the dynamodb in Docker - a simple version being docker run -p 8000:8000 amazon/dynamodb-local but you could preserve the data in a volume if you wanted to as well.

@nlwstein Thank you!! good to know that would just work with our setup.

Is it worth updating the docs with that suggestion? I'm not sure how cautious we are with updating public-facing developer documents.

[github-actions]

Coverage of commit a9f8200

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 89.1% (4128 of 4631 lines)
  functions..: 70.9% (2231 of 3145 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

Download coverage report

[nlwstein]

@meagharty This is totally not blocking but I have found it helpful to run the dynamodb in Docker - a simple version being docker run -p 8000:8000 amazon/dynamodb-local but you could preserve the data in a volume if you wanted to as well.

@nlwstein Thank you!! good to know that would just work with our setup.

Is it worth updating the docs with that suggestion? I'm not sure how cautious we are with updating public-facing developer documents.

I don't think it needs to be updated yet, just figured I would mention it bc it made my setup easy 🙂

This looks good to me!