css.types.image.gradient: Remove -ms- prefix
#23603
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
An abstract type having a prefix doesn't make any sense. Nevertheless, I tested gradients on Edge 18 and 15 and found that prefixes had no effect for `conic-gradient()` or `linear-conic-gradient()` and neither was supported in any case. I believe this be a case of a prefix being wrongly reported, then copied, from IE data.
ddbeck
changed the title
cs..types.image.gradient: Remove -ms- prefixcss.types.image.gradient: Remove -ms- prefix
github-actions
bot
added
the
data:css
foolip
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Edge never appears to have never supported a prefix for any
<gradient>CSS value type.Test results and supporting details
An abstract type having a prefix doesn't make any sense. Nevertheless, I tested gradients on Edge 18 and 15 and found that prefixes had no effect for
conic-gradient()orlinear-conic-gradient()and neither was supported in any case. The other gradients were supported without prefixes.I believe this be a case of a prefix being wrongly reported, then copied, from IE data.
Related issues
Discovered in the course of calculating aggregated statuses in web-features https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/pull/1231/files#r1660916516