chore(ci): Switch out labeler action, define labels in workflow inline instead of by config file

[bsmth]

Description

Use labeler action that accepts pull_request_target GH events instead of https://github.com/cbrgm/pr-size-labeler-action.

Motivation

The pr-size-labeler-action action is really nice, but has hardcoded GITHUB_EVENT_NAME consts in the Go code, see isValidEvent function.

PRs from forks (99% of those landing here) are therefore ignored, so switching out to one with less features, but works as expected.

Related issues and pull requests

• chore(ci): Add labels to PRs based on LoC / num files changed #31729
• chore(ci): Add perms for PR labeler #31738

[LeoMcA]

lgtm! 🤞

[bsmth]

Thank you, merging shortly

[cbrgm]

Hi there @bsmth, I believe that replacing the hardcoded event type with a list of valid options or making the event type configurable is a worthwhile suggestion. It seems like this issue could be a significant blocker for many others as well. 😄

[cbrgm]

Released in v1.1.10 / v1 . I'm sorry for troubles this might have caused. Despite switching to a different action, I appreciate your effort in trying out this one and helping to identify the issue @bsmth @LeoMcA . 😃

[bsmth]

Hey there 👋🏻 nice to see you dropping in! After looking at quite a few actions, I think yours is looking great and I was reluctant to get rid of it, to be honest.

Released in v1.1.10 / v1 .

That was fast! Well done, I think that should cover the only viable event types that can be passed. I would really like to try this out again in future. We have a reusable workflows repo that might be a good place to add it.

I'm sorry for troubles this might have caused

Not at all, it gets a little noisy for people who are watching the repo in terms of notifications, but that's how it is sometimes with GH actions, it's tricky to test without pushing to main for some cases.

Feel free to drop into our Discord, we could have a chat about it!