JTS to TOC

[ghost]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_contents

[peterbe]

I'm not convinced. It's in a side-bar after all. GitHub Docs calls it "In this article" which is nice. Accurate.

[ghost]

Even the code uses toc and It has a Wikipedia article 🤷🏻‍♂️
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Jump+to+section&ns0=1

[ghost]

I still want to call It
Table of contents

but i want to say that Is not a table but a ul 🤯

[peterbe]

"Table of contents" is usually something you have in the content. On the first page. Not on the side.

[ghost]

A table of contents, usually headed simply Contents and abbreviated informally as TOC, is a list, usually found on a page before the start of a written work, of its chapter or section titles or brief descriptions with their commencing page numbers.

• document is a chapter
• origin is a book

In general is the content in the context like when you logs the entries in an object.

🌳

Table of contents is in the content so links to self? 🤔

[ghost]

I'm not convinced. It's in a side-bar after all. GitHub Docs calls it "In this article" which is nice. Accurate.

Table of contents in this article

And We have to use a table.

Instead

Unordered list of contents in this article

[ghost]

Side issue

mdn/content provides contents so It could be called mdn/contents.

[ghost]

Yes it could be moved but in separate PRs.
I used to update in a commit and move in other commit.

[ghost]

<article>
<h1>Title</h1>
<section>
<h1>Table of contents</h1>
<table/>
</section>
<section/>
<section/>
</article>

draft/concept

[peterbe]

Let's not worry about making the change. But please feel free to start a discussion about changing the English. I don't think we should just jump into an edit without consent from the content folks.