-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
78 - Fix checksum migration issue #79
Changes from 2 commits
53c8b27
16deec3
e91bde8
7c8b615
d1d132f
28a60d7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1,2 @@ | ||
node_modules | ||
.idea/ |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | ||
-- Recreates the view only to add the new column contact_type | ||
DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW IF EXISTS contactview_metadata CASCADE; | ||
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW contactview_metadata AS | ||
SELECT doc->>'_id' AS uuid, | ||
doc->>'name' AS name, | ||
doc->>'type' AS type, | ||
doc->>'contact_type' AS contact_type, --> only this is new | ||
doc#>>'{contact,_id}' AS contact_uuid, | ||
doc#>>'{parent,_id}' AS parent_uuid, | ||
doc->>'notes' AS notes, | ||
TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE 'epoch' + (doc->>'reported_date')::numeric / 1000 * interval '1 second' AS reported | ||
FROM raw_contacts; | ||
|
||
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX contactview_metadata_uuid ON contactview_metadata (uuid); | ||
CREATE INDEX contactview_metadata_contact_uuid ON contactview_metadata (contact_uuid); | ||
CREATE INDEX contactview_metadata_parent_uuid ON contactview_metadata (parent_uuid); | ||
CREATE INDEX contactview_metadata_type ON contactview_metadata (type); | ||
|
||
-- NOTE: The recreation of the view above caused 4 other views to be dropped in cascade, | ||
-- here are the scripts to recreate them: | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we should link to the original migration that created each of these (including the line numbers). Something like: https://github.com/medic/medic-couch2pg/blob/master/libs/analytics/migrations/201711071603.do.2635-removeNestedContactReferences.sql#L26 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes better to keep track of that, adding... |
||
CREATE VIEW contactview_hospital AS | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Super sad we have to have all this duplicated code. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, next time we use Postgrator to mantain views, may be better to use *.js script to reuse better the SQL scripts. Also it is sad that Postgres does not allow to add a column in a view without the need to recreate it manually, whether the engine needs to recreate the entirely view or not, it should be an internal decision made by the engine. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I actually read a little around this, and people were complaining that they can't update materialized views in pgadmin - which is arguably probably even more popular than Postgrator. It could be pgadmin has improved since those posts though, but my point is that this seems like it is a common problem with other pg tools and not something that's easily automated. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes the problem is that Postgres does not support There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ... and my point is that even if that is not possible without the recreation of the whole materialized view, that should be an implementation detail for the engine, not for the user, Postgres could support There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yea, I agree it's a less then ideal situation. |
||
SELECT cmd.uuid, cmd.name | ||
FROM contactview_metadata AS cmd | ||
WHERE cmd.type = 'district_hospital'; | ||
|
||
CREATE VIEW contactview_chw AS | ||
SELECT chw.name, pplfields.*, chwarea.uuid AS area_uuid, | ||
chwarea.parent_uuid AS branch_uuid | ||
FROM contactview_person_fields AS pplfields | ||
INNER JOIN contactview_metadata AS chw ON (chw.uuid = pplfields.uuid) | ||
INNER JOIN contactview_metadata AS chwarea ON (chw.parent_uuid = chwarea.uuid) | ||
WHERE pplfields.parent_type = 'health_center'; | ||
|
||
CREATE VIEW contactview_clinic AS | ||
SELECT cmd.uuid, cmd.name, chw.uuid AS chw_uuid, cmd.reported AS created | ||
FROM contactview_metadata AS cmd | ||
INNER JOIN contactview_chw AS chw ON (cmd.parent_uuid = chw.area_uuid) | ||
WHERE type = 'clinic'; | ||
|
||
CREATE VIEW contactview_clinic_person AS | ||
SELECT | ||
raw_contacts.doc ->> '_id' AS uuid, | ||
raw_contacts.doc ->> 'name' AS name, | ||
raw_contacts.doc ->> 'type' AS type, | ||
raw_contacts.doc #>> '{parent,_id}' AS family_uuid, | ||
raw_contacts.doc ->> 'phone' AS phone, | ||
raw_contacts.doc ->> 'alternative_phone' AS phone2, | ||
raw_contacts.doc ->> 'date_of_birth' AS date_of_birth, | ||
cmeta.type AS parent_type | ||
FROM | ||
raw_contacts | ||
LEFT JOIN contactview_metadata AS cmeta ON (doc #>> '{parent,_id}' = cmeta.uuid) | ||
WHERE | ||
raw_contacts.doc->>'type' = 'person' AND | ||
raw_contacts.doc->>'_id' IN (SELECT contact_uuid FROM contactview_metadata WHERE type = 'clinic'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should really have a
release-notes.md
to contain this information, instead of the readme.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree. @garethbowen do you want me to prepare a new PR for the release ? I can create there the release note file and move this content. The release version should be
3.2.1
, right?