Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(core-flows,types): Refunds can only be performed when order is imbalanced #8944

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

riqwan
Copy link
Contributor

@riqwan riqwan commented Sep 2, 2024

what:

Due to the fact that any adhoc refunds cause an imbalance in the order totals, we constrain the refunds to only be performed when there is an outstanding balance in the order

RESOLVES CC-412

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 3, 2024 10:37am
medusa-dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 3, 2024 10:37am
5 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 3, 2024 10:37am
docs-ui ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 3, 2024 10:37am
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 3, 2024 10:37am
medusa-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 3, 2024 10:37am
resources-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 3, 2024 10:37am

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 2, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: bc7d662

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@olivermrbl olivermrbl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM, should be good to merge, but would be good to have @carlos-r-l-rodrigues eyes on it as well

Co-authored-by: Oli Juhl <59018053+olivermrbl@users.noreply.github.com>
@riqwan riqwan merged commit 230acb7 into develop Sep 3, 2024
23 checks passed
@riqwan riqwan deleted the feat/constrain-refunds branch September 3, 2024 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants