Change to the I2C Scan to distinguish QMI8658 and BQ24295 #3554
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sharing the same I2C address, the QMI8658 IMU and BQ24295 PMU.
garethhcoleman
changed the title
thebentern
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2024
thebentern
added a commit
to meshtastic/artifacts
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2024
caveman99
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Both these devices share the same I2C address (0x6B) the QMI8658 IMU and BQ24295 PMU.
I've got a BQ24295 to test and it seems to work but I am unable to test with a QMI8658. I don't imagine reading from register 0xA would cause any problems, but if would be really good if someone is able to verify this, also to check that the contents of it don't accidently match the version ID from the BQ24295!!
Fingers crossed I got the trunking formatted correctly this time...