Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(rs-port): wrong implemenetation for user data in MetacallFuture #527

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hulxv
Copy link
Contributor

@hulxv hulxv commented Sep 27, 2024

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes #(issue_no)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have added tests/screenshots (if any) that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have tested the tests implicated (if any) by my own code and they pass (make test or ctest -VV -R <test-name>).
  • If my change is significant or breaking, I have passed all tests with ./docker-compose.sh test &> output and attached the output.
  • I have tested my code with OPTION_BUILD_ADDRESS_SANITIZER or ./docker-compose.sh test-address-sanitizer &> output and OPTION_TEST_MEMORYCHECK.
  • I have tested my code with OPTION_BUILD_THREAD_SANITIZER or ./docker-compose.sh test-thread-sanitizer &> output.
  • I have tested with Helgrind in case my code works with threading.
  • I have run make clang-format in order to format my code and my code follows the style guidelines.

If you are unclear about any of the above checks, have a look at our documentation here.

@hulxv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hulxv commented Sep 29, 2024

@devraymondsh @viferga

@devraymondsh
Copy link
Member

The X_untyped function format is designed so that the user is not forced to pass a generic and would use the value through pointer polymorphism. Adding a generic to it would not only be a noticeable breaking change but I wouldn't think it's a good idea anyway. I suggest making a new API specifically for async functions which would be something like X_async or something similar.

@viferga viferga marked this pull request as draft November 1, 2024 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants