Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pet #4531

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

Pet #4531

merged 12 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

mazsa
Copy link
Contributor

@mazsa mazsa commented Jan 4, 2025

Mathbox only. (I used some theorems from other people's Mathboxes with TEMP ending: I'll put them in the main in my next PR). Maybe more appropriate for the weekend, since this is a big PR. The commits are more or less separate.

Partition and its relation to equivalence is the main topic. The main results are

  • MPET, the Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem in its shortest possible form: it shows, not too surprisingly, that member partitions and comember equivalence relations are literally the same. mpets $p |- MembParts = CoMembErs

  • PET, the Partition-Equivalence Theorem, which, while not general by itself (e.g. MPET is not a special case of it), works with general R in biconditional form, which is sufficient for my use case. pet $p |- ( ( R |X. ( ' _E | A ) ) Part A <-> ,~ ( R |X. ( ' _E | A ) ) ErALTV A )

Thank you for your time and effort.

Copy link
Contributor

@jkingdon jkingdon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My review consisted mostly of confirming this is mathbox-only; I don't know if someone else wanted to take a closer look.

@wlammen wlammen merged commit 3baea8d into metamath:develop Jan 7, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants