You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a problem in documentation that likely stemmed from implementation:
The treatment of terms encoding in "systematic order" (concept / subconcept) should be identical whether it is a vocabulary document or a normal document.
There are now two ways of adding description text to a mixed order clause:
== Terms and definitions
[.grouping]
=== Term grouping 1
Paragraph 1
==== Term A
Definition A
==== Term B
Definition B
[.grouping]
=== Term grouping 2
Paragraph 2
==== Term C
Definition C
and
== Terms and definitions=== Term grouping 1
[.boilerplate]
==== {blank}
The following terms are adopted from ISO 10303-2.
==== Term A
Definition A
==== Term B
Definition B
=== Term grouping 2
[.boilerplate]
==== {blank}
The following terms are adopted from ISO 10303-11.
==== Term C
Definition C
The second method seems unnecessary and in fact rather contrived.
The treatment of terms encoding in "systematic order" (concept / subconcept) should be identical whether it is a vocabulary document or a normal document.
The implementation allows it in both places, and not validated against.
Boilerplate markup does seem contrived, agreed. Taking out.
opoudjis
added a commit
to metanorma/metanorma.org
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2024
There is a problem in documentation that likely stemmed from implementation:
and
The second method seems unnecessary and in fact rather contrived.
Originally posted by @ronaldtse in metanorma/metanorma.org#733 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: