Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a scheduled check that the tests work #2587

Merged

Conversation

wxtim
Copy link
Contributor

@wxtim wxtim commented May 8, 2022

Having just discovered that the tests have been failing on master for 19 days since cylc/cylc-flow#4823 was merged I propose the addition of a daily run of the test battery on weekdays so that repository subscribers get to see a problem early.

Given that this is a touch more expensive than the Cylc Rose tests which it is copied from I'd be willing to make it run only on Monday and Thursday mornings, or something like that.

@wxtim wxtim added this to the 2.0rc3 milestone May 8, 2022
@wxtim wxtim requested review from MetRonnie and oliver-sanders May 8, 2022 09:26
@wxtim wxtim self-assigned this May 8, 2022
@wxtim wxtim added the bug? label May 8, 2022
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders removed the request for review from MetRonnie May 9, 2022 09:07
@oliver-sanders oliver-sanders merged commit 808562b into metomi:master May 9, 2022
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ on:
cylc_repo:
description: The Cylc repo to test against
required: false
schedule:
- cron: '37 04 * * 1-5' # 03:37, Monday-Friday
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the idea was to run once or twice a week? Also the comment says 03:37 whereas it is actually 04:37

@MetRonnie MetRonnie added small infrastructure GH Actions, Codecov etc. labels May 9, 2022
@wxtim wxtim deleted the add_a_scheduled_check_of_the_workflow branch May 10, 2022 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
infrastructure GH Actions, Codecov etc. small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants