Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upstream todoist suggestion: ability to enter text for multi-item reschedule #24

Closed
mgsloan opened this issue May 27, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Upstream todoist suggestion: ability to enter text for multi-item reschedule #24

mgsloan opened this issue May 27, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
needs-upstream-enhancement Issue blocked on upstream change

Comments

@mgsloan
Copy link
Owner

mgsloan commented May 27, 2018

If you select multiple items and press "Schedule", a calendar pops up for rescheduling. However, since there is no text entry, it does not seem to be possible to set event recurrence for multiple items at a time. For todoist-shortcuts, it also means I'm considering implementing a complicated system to let you type the numbers of days from the calendar view :O
@mgsloan mgsloan added the needs-upstream-enhancement Issue blocked on upstream change label May 27, 2018
mgsloan added a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2018
@mgsloan
Remove old TODO items and migrate others to issue tracker
882b0f6 
See #22, #23, #24
@amix
Copy link

amix commented Jun 18, 2018

We are redoing the scheduler, so I would not recommend changing anything right now :)

@mgsloan mgsloan mentioned this issue Aug 20, 2018
Closed
@mgsloan
Copy link
Owner Author

mgsloan commented Oct 19, 2018

Yep, looks like this is now on https://beta.todoist.com - great stuff!

@mgsloan mgsloan closed this as completed Oct 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
needs-upstream-enhancement Issue blocked on upstream change
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mgsloan @amix