-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bsRecord on inline fragment #60
Labels
Comments
Don't you also need |
Adding or removing |
This is a bug in the current limitation, thanks for reporting this. |
Fixed in 0.2.8. |
Hi @mhallin! The bug seems to be fixed in 0.2.8 for union types, but I still have the bug for interfaces :/ |
ylecornec
pushed a commit
to o1-labs/graphql_ppx
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2022
* ci: would this work? * ci: add docker:// to release pipeline * ci: add artifacts to test ppx on alpine * ci: try static linking * ci: try static linking * ci: are we in alpine? how this works? * ci: are we in alpine? how this works? * ci: are we in alpine? how this works? * ci: are we in alpine? how this works? * ci: are we in alpine? how this works? * ci: try container action * ci: try custom container for building alpine image * ci: adjust release workflow to use docker container
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
I am trying to write a query containing union types. I first wrote a separated fragment and got a clear message: only inline fragments are supported with union types. So I wrote my query like this:
But the bsRecord on the
... on Dataset @bsRecord
does not work: the fragment is parsed as an object instead of a record. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?Thanks :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: