Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for ConsumerRecords container type on batch processing #904

Merged

Conversation

rorueda
Copy link
Contributor

@rorueda rorueda commented Oct 26, 2023

See #903

The changes are:

  • Bind arguments of ConsumerRecords type;
  • Consider ConsumerRecords type when looking for the "body argument" to configure the correct key and value deserializers;
  • Add a test;

@sdelamo
Copy link
Contributor

sdelamo commented Nov 12, 2023

@jeremyg484 can you please review this?

Copy link
Contributor

@jeremyg484 jeremyg484 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea and code itself are great, other than my minor nitpicking about not using Optional as a method parameter.

Beyond that, the docs need to be updated to describe this new option.

@rorueda
Copy link
Contributor Author

rorueda commented Nov 13, 2023

I rebased it onto master and made the requested change.

@jeremyg484 jeremyg484 merged commit eb56c23 into micronaut-projects:master Jan 12, 2024
6 checks passed
@rorueda rorueda deleted the consumer-records-support branch January 25, 2024 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants