Firewall Policy

[tamirkamara]

Resolves #3100 Resolves #2723

What is being addressed

Update the firewall implementation to use policies (instead of classic rules).

How is this addressed

• Use a firewall policy resource and define rules in it
• Support for Basic firewall SKU. The default is still Standard as in most cases a standard one will be cheaper (since a basic one can't be deallocated/stopped).

An example policy:

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

0 tests   0 ✔️  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit fbf29b4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2E Test Results

25 tests  +25   25 ✔️ +25   9s ⏱️ +9s
  1 suites +  1     0 💤 ±  0 
  1 files   +  1     0 ❌ ±  0 

Results for commit 1199737. ± Comparison against base commit bc7378d.

[tamirkamara]

/test-extended

[github-actions]

🤖 pr-bot 🤖

🏃 Running extended tests: https://github.com/microsoft/AzureTRE/actions/runs/3995371817 (with refid 9bd44e2d)

(in response to this comment from @tamirkamara)

[tamirkamara]

/test-extended

[github-actions]

🤖 pr-bot 🤖

🏃 Running extended tests: https://github.com/microsoft/AzureTRE/actions/runs/3996342602 (with refid 9bd44e2d)

(in response to this comment from @tamirkamara)

[tamirkamara]

/test-extended

[github-actions]

🤖 pr-bot 🤖

🏃 Running extended tests: https://github.com/microsoft/AzureTRE/actions/runs/3997565748 (with refid 9bd44e2d)

(in response to this comment from @tamirkamara)

[tamirkamara]

/test-extended

[github-actions]

🤖 pr-bot 🤖

🏃 Running extended tests: https://github.com/microsoft/AzureTRE/actions/runs/3998579110 (with refid 9bd44e2d)

(in response to this comment from @tamirkamara)

[tamirkamara]

/test-force-approve
test was successful but produced an error in teardown which is unrelated to this PR.

[github-actions]

🤖 pr-bot 🤖

✅ Marking tests as complete (for commit fbf29b4)

(in response to this comment from @tamirkamara)