Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[C#] Clean up TargetFramework defines, enable IAsyncEnumerable on netstandard2.0/net461 #377

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 29, 2020

Conversation

TedHartMS
Copy link
Contributor

@TedHartMS TedHartMS commented Nov 25, 2020

  • Change the order in the csproj so netstandard2.1 is first, which appears to be the one that's used by the IDE for #if resolution
  • Switch to the TargetFramework preprocessor symbols already defined by the build system (we use NETSTANDARD and NETSTANDARD2_1)
  • Add Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces for pre-netstandard2.1 frameworks, which allows IAsyncEnumerable to work
  • Added tests for FasterLogIterator.GetAsyncEnumerable()
  • Add netcore2.1 in FASTER.tests.csproj
  • Add task to run tests in C# Linux pipeline

TedHartMS and others added 16 commits November 24, 2020 21:24
- Change the order in the csproj so netstandard2.1 is first, which appears to be the one that's used by the IDE for #if <TargetFramework> resolution
- Switch to the TargetFramework preprocessor symbols already defined by the build system (we use NETSTANDARD and NETSTANDARD2_1)
- Add Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces for pre-netstandard2.1 frameworks, which allows IAsyncEnumerable to work
- Added tests for FasterLogIterator.GetAsyncEnumerable()
- Enable netcore2.2 in FASTER.tests.csproj
…sterLogIterator.GetAsyncEnumerable(MemoryPool<T>)
Put UseDotNet@2 task in the right place
@badrishc badrishc changed the title Clean up targetframework defines and enable IAsyncEnumerable on netstandard2.0/net461 [C#] Clean up TargetFramework defines, enable IAsyncEnumerable on netstandard2.0/net461 Nov 29, 2020
@badrishc badrishc merged commit a27f0b5 into master Nov 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants