Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests][python] Handle data types more accurate in C API test #4297

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 20, 2021

Conversation

StrikerRUS
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Collaborator

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks very much for breaking long lines like into one-argument-per-line. I think that makes it easier to read, which is really important since some of the functions take so many positional arguments.

I just left one question about how we're using ctypes but it isn't directly related to this PR and could be addressed in a later PR if something needs to change.

c_array(ctypes.c_int, csr.indices),
csr.data.ctypes.data_as(ctypes.POINTER(ctypes.c_void_p)),
dtype_float64,
csr.indptr.ctypes.data_as(ctypes.POINTER(ctypes.c_int32)),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could this use .byref() instead of POINTER()?

From https://docs.python.org/3/library/ctypes.html#passing-pointers-or-passing-parameters-by-reference

ctypes exports the byref() function which is used to pass parameters by reference. The same effect can be achieved with the pointer() function, although pointer() does a lot more work since it constructs a real pointer object, so it is faster to use byref() if you don’t need the pointer object in Python itself.

I'm very unfamiliar with ctypes so apologies if that doesn't make sense.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wish I knew... The cited paragraph looks like we can benefit from using byref instead of pointer. I will create a new issue for this idea to not lose in the merged PR and read about it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok thanks very much!

label = np.array(label, dtype=np.float32)
csr = sparse.csc_matrix(mat)
csc = sparse.csc_matrix(mat)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for catching this!

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity since it was closed. To start a new related discussion, open a new issue at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues including a reference to this.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants