-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[R-package] expose start_iteration to dump/save/lgb.model.dt.tree #6398
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this! Now that CI seems to be working again, let's continue with this. I left some initial suggestions and questions for your consideration, but overall I'm very supportive of this addition to the R package's API.
Co-authored-by: James Lamb <jaylamb20@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Lamb <jaylamb20@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Lamb <jaylamb20@gmail.com>
…into r-batchwise-imp
Co-authored-by: James Lamb <jaylamb20@gmail.com>
…into r-batchwise-imp
@jameslamb Increadible review, thank you so much for your dedication! Some comments:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much!
Thanks for working with me on the unit tests. I'm really happy that this PR is going to add so much better coverage of an under-tested part of the library.
I left one more set of small suggestions, and then I think this is ready to merge 🎉
Co-authored-by: James Lamb <jaylamb20@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Lamb <jaylamb20@gmail.com>
Perfect! Should we reformulate the docstrings of all affected functions? |
yes please |
done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks very much!
Fixes #6397
Contributes to #6380