Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support x86 platform #602

Closed
Urs1956 opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 54 comments
Closed

Support x86 platform #602

Urs1956 opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 54 comments
Labels
Area-Setup/Install Refers to installation mechanism Cost-Large Large work item - 3+ days worth of work (chances are needs to be broken down)

Comments

@Urs1956
Copy link

Urs1956 commented Oct 30, 2019

Hello,
if i try to install the Power Toys from the msi-package, i got this message.
Plattform is Win 10 pro, Build 1903
Power-Toy error

crutkas: #413 is a prereq for this to be supported

@enricogior enricogior added the Area-Setup/Install Refers to installation mechanism label Oct 30, 2019
@retrorich75
Copy link

retrorich75 commented Oct 30, 2019

Hi Ur

Hello,
if i try to install the Power Toys from the msi-package, i got this message.
Plattform is Win 10 pro, Build 1903
Power-Toy error

Kind regards
Urs1956

Hi Urs1956,

Can you check in the Event Viewer (right click Start Menu to open)

Under Windows Log, Application Do you see any Warning or Errors ?

If any errors any code(s) ? Any code from this page https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/windows-installer-error-messages ?

Richard

PS installed okay on my Win10 Home build 19013.vb_release.191025-1609

@retrorich75
Copy link

Hi Urs1956,

Any feedback? Be great to know.

Richard

@Urs1956
Copy link
Author

Urs1956 commented Nov 4, 2019 via email

@Urs1956
Copy link
Author

Urs1956 commented Nov 4, 2019

Hi,
Sorry, the same issues as ver 0.12 also in ver 0.13.

Greetings

@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Urs1956
are you installing using PowerToysSetup.msi?
Please, open a Command Prompt, navigate to the folder where PowerToysSetup.msi is and run the following command:

msiexec /i PowerToysSetup.msi /l*v "install.log"

install.log should contain useful information to determine the problem.
You can upload the file here (drag and drop the file, instead of copying the content).
Thank you.

@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

@Urs1956
your hardware is AMD or Intel 64 bit?
32 bit and ARM are not currently supported.

@Urs1956
Copy link
Author

Urs1956 commented Nov 4, 2019

AMD FX-8350 and Win 10 Pro 32bit.

That´s it ;-)

@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

We currently don't have plans to support 32 bit. We might in the future but it's not a guarantee.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

@retrorich75
Copy link

We currently don't have plans to support 32 bit. We might in the future but it's not a guarantee.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

So @enricogior maybe worth to update readme to mention no 32bit support?

Sorry about that Gert @Urs1956

@retrorich75
Copy link

Gert @Urs1956 why not change to 64bit ? Unless you need specifically 32bit guide available on the net for example https://www.windowscentral.com/how-upgrade-32-bit-64-bit-version-windows-10

@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

@retrorich75

maybe worth to update readme to mention no 32bit support?

I thought it was there, sorry about it, I'll make sure we add it.
Thanks.

@enricogior enricogior added the Issue-Docs Documentation issue that needs to be improved label Nov 5, 2019
@enricogior enricogior changed the title This install package is not supported on this plattform This install package is not supported on X86 platform Nov 5, 2019
@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

@indierawk2k2 we should mention in the Readme that x86 is not supported.

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Nov 9, 2019

@Urs1956 i'm wondering why you are on a 32bit OS with a rather new processor?

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Nov 9, 2019

@enricogior this should be revisited with the ARM support discussion, there are people that run 32vs64bit.

@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

@crutkas in the meantime can you update the readme?

@crutkas crutkas changed the title This install package is not supported on X86 platform Support x86 platform Nov 11, 2019
@crutkas crutkas added this to the 0.14 milestone Nov 11, 2019
@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Nov 11, 2019

@enricogior did a PR for adjustment on readme

@crutkas crutkas removed the Issue-Docs Documentation issue that needs to be improved label Nov 11, 2019
@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

#413 is a prerequisite for this issue.

@lukebarone
Copy link

@enricogior did a PR for adjustment on readme

The text for saying what issue this is reads #620 as opposed to #602

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Nov 13, 2019

@lukebarone, good catch, the link was good but text was wrong. fixed.

@crutkas crutkas modified the milestones: 0.14, 0.16 Nov 20, 2019
@crutkas crutkas mentioned this issue Dec 11, 2019
@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

@sudo-nautilus I don't think so. You would compile using Visual Studio (pretty sure), but there are dependencies and other stuff that doesn't support x86, so you cannot compile for x86 yet

Thanks anyway

@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

@kethan1 Is there any other way to compile ?

@kethan1
Copy link

kethan1 commented Feb 22, 2021

@sudo-nautilus if you want to compile for x64, the only way I know of is Visual Studio. Currently, compiling for x86 is impossible, without investing a significant amount of time by making the dependencies and code compatible with x86.

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Feb 22, 2021

This is going to be easier to do once we support ARM.

Right now i believe a lot (if not all) our projects only target x64.

@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

sudo-nautilus commented Feb 23, 2021

@crutkas @kethan1
Thanks, I will wait for the future releases or I will buy a new pc.

@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

@sudo-nautilus I don't think so. You would compile using Visual Studio (pretty sure), but there are dependencies and other stuff that doesn't support x86, so you cannot compile for x86 yet

Oof

@dxgldotorg
Copy link

@kethan1 I believe this change at this point is only a policy of no longer offering OEM licenses for 32-bit. Even Windows Insider Preview is still offered in 32-bit format.

@lukemcdo
Copy link

Hi,

Worth noting that 32-bit Windows is still an important platform in part due to its enhanced backwards-compatibility with older drivers and older proprietary software that won't be updated. While it is true that for the most part, 32-bit x86 hardware is being phased out, that does not mean that the use cases for 32-bit Windows are being phased out at all.

@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

Bruh

@dxgldotorg
Copy link

dxgldotorg commented Apr 24, 2021

Hi,

Worth noting that 32-bit Windows is still an important platform in part due to its enhanced backwards-compatibility with older drivers and older proprietary software that won't be updated. While it is true that for the most part, 32-bit x86 hardware is being phased out, that does not mean that the use cases for 32-bit Windows are being phased out at all.

While drivers remain an issue, there is now an unofficial means of running 16-bit software under Windows 64-bit called OTVDM - https://github.com/otya128/winevdm
Note this program is currently under development, and that you'll probably want the unstable version linked to from the readme (get the build from the "THIS_BUILD_IS_RECOMMENDED__VCXPROJ_BUILD=1" environment) for maximum compatibility.
This program contains a CPU emulator to run 16-bit x86 though it can support virtualization depending on the environment; the Win16 implementation is done via code from the Wine project.

DOS programs can be run using DOSBox on both 32- and 64-bit platforms, and unlike NTVDM can run with full graphics and sound.

@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

woah that's amazing

@sudo-nautilus
Copy link

Hi,
Worth noting that 32-bit Windows is still an important platform in part due to its enhanced backwards-compatibility with older drivers and older proprietary software that won't be updated. While it is true that for the most part, 32-bit x86 hardware is being phased out, that does not mean that the use cases for 32-bit Windows are being phased out at all.

While drivers remain an issue, there is now an unofficial means of running 16-bit software under Windows 64-bit called OTVDM - https://github.com/otya128/winevdm
Note this program is currently under development, and that you'll probably want the unstable version linked to from the readme (get the build from the "THIS_BUILD_IS_RECOMMENDED__VCXPROJ_BUILD=1" environment) for maximum compatibility.
This program contains a CPU emulator to run 16-bit x86 though it can support virtualization depending on the environment; the Win16 implementation is done via code from the Wine project.

DOS programs can be run using DOSBox on both 32- and 64-bit platforms, and unlike NTVDM can run with full graphics and sound.

could you please explain how is that connected with 64 bit executables or this issue ?

@lukemcdo
Copy link

lukemcdo commented Apr 26, 2021

The prior poster wanted to explain away a reason for choosing 32-bit Windows 10 that I offered for the sake of discussion.

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Apr 26, 2021

Some users want it, we totally understand that. This is a large sum of work to support due to building and how the projects are structured. Most of this will become pretty crisp and clear work wise with ARM64 being being added.

Based on user requests however and scope of work vs the ARM64 work, we are prioritizing that first.

@just1a-person
Copy link
Contributor

With Windows 11, is x86 support a really high priority issue anymore?

@dxgldotorg
Copy link

With Windows 11, is x86 support a really high priority issue anymore?

I was about to ask the same thing. It's not like it does anything that requires low level manipulation of 32-bit processes and if it did then there would be the necessary 32-bit components included for said processes.

@lukemcdo
Copy link

There will still be x86 builds of Windows for certain enterprise workloads from what I saw, but yes, the Windows 11 announcement does make the need dramatically lower since consumers will not have official access to 32 bit builds.

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Sep 29, 2021

@lukemcdo, can you explain these workloads?

@lukemcdo
Copy link

lukemcdo commented Sep 29, 2021

I mean, it's the standard "old hardware" sort of workloads. Old label printers with no direct replacement model available, things like that. Archivists also use 32-bit Windows. It's niche, I'm not going to pretend it's vital or important.

I have a VM using 32-bit Windows for testing builds that I wouldn't mind having PowerToys on, but honestly I only ended up on this issue because I was curious why it didn't exist, not because I have an essential need for it on my VM.

@NeoTechni
Copy link

I have a Windows 10 tablet that the manufacturer only made the drivers for 32 bit windows to save power despite it being a 64 bit CPU

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Sep 30, 2021

@NeoTechni that seems interesting, any chance you can share OEM and model?

@NeoTechni
Copy link

The Linx Vision 8 (it also only has 32GB of EMMC flash, and Win10 takes ALLLLL of it, to the point where Windows can't even update anymore. The irony given they said it was made for tablets, and yet it won't let you install apps to the SD card)

I got it cause it has a controller dock/grip. Though with only 2 GB of RAM and 32 bit Windows it's quite limited. Especially since some games won't even run if they aren't installed on C:\

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Nov 10, 2021

We are not planning to support x86 now that Windows 11 is x64 and ARM only. For the large sums of work to test each build and considering the core base for PowerToys are power users, this is hard to justify the continual work to validate.

@dxgldotorg
Copy link

Would you accept or reject PRs that enabled x86 builds?

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Nov 10, 2021

The issue is more the long term support / testing. We are a small team and this adds a bit bit of extra testing. There could be so many gotcha's like ARM64 support had.

I could see accepting a PR to help enable this (as this work would also help ARM64 support) but I don't think we'd ever officially support it.

@neakmenter
Copy link

so, pretty much any tablet or stick pc with atom z3xxx cpus are given a 32bit uefi - this means that only 32 bit windows can be installed (there are workarounds for 64 bit Linux though). there are many "Bay trail" tablets with this config - even from major vendors such as dell, Lenovo, Asus etc... it was related to win8 connected standby and Intel not having a 64bit uefi ready at release or something?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Setup/Install Refers to installation mechanism Cost-Large Large work item - 3+ days worth of work (chances are needs to be broken down)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests