Skip to content

Conversation

@miscco
Copy link
Contributor

@miscco miscco commented Nov 12, 2020

This removes the comments for some of the resolved LWG issues.

#Addresses #1446

@miscco miscco requested a review from a team as a code owner November 12, 2020 07:13
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej added the documentation Related to documentation or comments label Nov 12, 2020
@CaseyCarter
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW, I think I'd prefer to hold off reviewing this until we finish #1446 so we can continue to push any comment cleanups into this PR instead of having multiple such PRs.

The following issues were recently resolved in the Standard,
and are completely implemented:

LWG-3403 Domain of ranges::ssize(E) doesn't match ranges::size(E)
LWG-3420 cpp17-iterator should check that the type looks like an iterator first
LWG-3428 single_view's in place constructor should be explicit
LWG-3435 three_way_comparable_with<reverse_iterator<int*>, reverse_iterator<const int*>>
LWG-3446 indirectly_readable_traits ambiguity for types with both value_type and element_type
LWG-3465 compare_partial_order_fallback requires F < E
LWG-3467 bool can't be an integer-like type
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

I believe I've pushed changes for all of the implemented-and-commented issues.

@miscco
Copy link
Contributor Author

miscco commented Nov 13, 2020

Awesome, thanks a lot ;)

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej self-assigned this Nov 13, 2020
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej merged commit 560bcea into microsoft:master Nov 14, 2020
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

Thanks for cleaning up these comments (and implementing many of these resolutions in the ranges code!). 🚀

@miscco miscco deleted the LWG_issues branch November 17, 2020 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Related to documentation or comments

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants