<functional>
: Deleted operator()
overloads for return types of bind
, bind_front
, and bind_back
#3775
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The deleted overloads prevent overload resolution flowing into another unintended overload when the invocation should be (SFINAE-friendlily) ill-formed.
Since the
operator()
overloads are constrained in default template arguments now, I think it would be better to usedecltype(auto)
to specify the return types.There seems to be something wrong with modules when using traditional SFINAE, so I'm changing to use
requires
when possible.Unblock one libc++ test:std/utilities/function.objects/func.bind_front/bind_front.pass.cpp
The test seemly requires
bind_front
to be SFINAE-friendly, while the Standard uses "Mandates:"... As a result, I decided to copy some parts of that file into MSVC STL's test file.Driven-by:
_STD
-qualify the internal calling helpers.