Treat NoSubstitutionTemplateLiteral same as a StringLiteral #17704
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
force-pushed
the
nosubstitutiontemplate
branch
from
5486b0d to
981347a
Compare
|
For something as common as literals, it's nice to be able to search for the symbol. Other than that, none that I can think of. |
rbuckton
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2017
ghost
mentioned this pull request
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #17595 and #16592
@rbuckton Is there some reason we don't just inline
checkLiteralExpression?